Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 110 (0.63 seconds)

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs Sh. Rajesh Stan. & Anr. on 16 December, 2022

5. The reason stated in the revision petition is supported with an affidavit. Therefore, to meet the ends of justice, we allow the present revision petition subject to the costs of Rs.3,000/- and set aside the impugned order dated 23.08.2022 of District Commission below. Costs shall be paid to the complainant before learned District Commission below 2 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., vs Sh. Rajesh Stan & Anr. R.P. No.74/2022 and learned District Commission below is directed to proceed with the matter further as per law after giving an opportunity to petitioner to file reply to consumer complaint.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Mercator Oil And Gas Ltd. And Another vs Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. And ... on 3 June, 2019

67. The very foundation of the above observations is that there should be sufficient evidence of fraud to the knowledge of the bank, in which case the bank can take a position that it would not honour the demand of payment under the bank guarantee. Surely the bank has not asserted such a position in the present case as also clearly seen from its reply affidavit. Thus although the proposition as laid down in the above decision cannot be doubted , it has no application to the facts of the present case.
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - G S Kulkarni - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next