Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 107 (2.38 seconds)
Documents citing Raj.Rajya Vidyut V Nigam Ltd vs Dwarka Prasad Koolwal & Ors on 7 August, 2014

Usha Balla vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghthan on 23 May, 2025

48. It was against these three sub-categories coming from the same category of employees that the argument of discrimination was considered by the Division Bench. Such was not the case in Krishena Kumar [Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, (1990) 4 SCC 207 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 112] or Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran [Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Dwarka Prasad Koolwal, (2015) 12 SCC 51 : (2016) 1 SCC (L&S) 315] . The matter was further considered by the Division Bench in the context of the employees of educational institutions such as IITs, who are directly under the Central Government, just as the employees of the University, which is a Central University.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kusum Dhawan vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghthan on 23 May, 2025

48. It was against these three sub-categories coming from the same category of employees that the argument of discrimination was considered by the Division Bench. Such was not the case in Krishena Kumar [Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, (1990) 4 SCC 207 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 112] or Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran [Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Dwarka Prasad Koolwal, (2015) 12 SCC 51 : (2016) 1 SCC (L&S) 315] . The matter was further considered by the Division Bench in the context of the employees of educational institutions such as IITs, who are directly under the Central Government, just as the employees of the University, which is a Central University.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manoj Kumar vs Kvs on 23 May, 2025

48. It was against these three sub-categories coming from the same category of employees that the argument of discrimination was considered by the Division Bench. Such was not the case in Krishena Kumar [Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, (1990) 4 SCC 207 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 112] or Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran [Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Dwarka Prasad Koolwal, (2015) 12 SCC 51 : (2016) 1 SCC (L&S) 315] . The matter was further considered by the Division Bench in the context of the employees of educational institutions such as IITs, who are directly under the Central Government, just as the employees of the University, which is a Central University.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashish Kumar Mitra vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghthan on 23 May, 2025

48. It was against these three sub-categories coming from the same category of employees that the argument of discrimination was considered by the Division Bench. Such was not the case in Krishena Kumar [Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, (1990) 4 SCC 207 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 112] or Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran [Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Dwarka Prasad Koolwal, (2015) 12 SCC 51 : (2016) 1 SCC (L&S) 315] . The matter was further considered by the Division Bench in the context of the employees of educational institutions such as IITs, who are directly under the Central Government, just as the employees of the University, which is a Central University.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neeta Khurana vs Kvs on 23 May, 2025

48. It was against these three sub-categories coming from the same category of employees that the argument of discrimination was considered by the Division Bench. Such was not the case in Krishena Kumar [Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, (1990) 4 SCC 207 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 112] or Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran [Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Dwarka Prasad Koolwal, (2015) 12 SCC 51 : (2016) 1 SCC (L&S) 315] . The matter was further considered by the Division Bench in the context of the employees of educational institutions such as IITs, who are directly under the Central Government, just as the employees of the University, which is a Central University.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amrit Pal vs Kvs on 23 May, 2025

48. It was against these three sub-categories coming from the same category of employees that the argument of discrimination was considered by the Division Bench. Such was not the case in Krishena Kumar [Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, (1990) 4 SCC 207 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 112] or Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran [Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Dwarka Prasad Koolwal, (2015) 12 SCC 51 : (2016) 1 SCC (L&S) 315] . The matter was further considered by the Division Bench in the context of the employees of educational institutions such as IITs, who are directly under the Central Government, just as the employees of the University, which is a Central University.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tarkeshwar Tiwari vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghthan on 23 May, 2025

48. It was against these three sub-categories coming from the same category of employees that the argument of discrimination was considered by the Division Bench. Such was not the case in Krishena Kumar [Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, (1990) 4 SCC 207 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 112] or Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran [Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Dwarka Prasad Koolwal, (2015) 12 SCC 51 : (2016) 1 SCC (L&S) 315] . The matter was further considered by the Division Bench in the context of the employees of educational institutions such as IITs, who are directly under the Central Government, just as the employees of the University, which is a Central University.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next