citedby: 219006

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Documents citing Rajam Chettiar Maha Sivarathiri ... vs Special Commissioner And Commissioner ... on 26 September, 1997

Arunachalam Nachammai, Chennai vs Department Of Income Tax on 24 June, 2016

3.3 The CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Rajam Chettiar Maha Sivarathri Ara Kattalai vs Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Agricultural Income tax (241 ITR 794) had laid down the ratio that once an order is quashed, nothing remains thereafter for adjudication.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.India Cements Ltd on 18 February, 2014

(v) As regards the fifth question of law in TCA No.188 of 2016, the learned counsel for the appellant/revenue submitted that having held that the reassessment was bad in law, the ITAT ought not to ____________ Page 9 of 32 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 12:03:13 pm ) TCA Nos.187 & 188 of 2016 have confirmed the finding of CIT(A) on merits and relied upon the judgment of this Court in Rajam Chettiar Mahasivarathiri Kattalai v. Special CIT and Commr. of Agrl.

Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Arunachalam Nachammai, Chennai vs Department Of Income Tax on 24 June, 2016

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.India Cements Ltd on 18 February, 2014