Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.53 seconds)
Documents citing Shri Anil Singhal, Muzaffarnagar vs Ito, Muzaffarnagar on 4 October, 2017

Bijendra Kumar, Mathura vs Ito-1(3)(1), Mathura on 3 July, 2018

In 'Anil Kumar Singhal vs. ITO', 33 taxman.com434 (Agra Trib) (SMC Bench), ITAT upheld the initiation of proceedings under section 148 of the Act after having found that after receipt of report from the Investigation Wing, the AO had applied his mind to such information and had then issued the notice to the assessee. No issue of non-application of mind by the AO, however, stands raised in the present case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Agra Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anita Yadav, Mathura vs Ito -1(3)(1), Mathura on 4 July, 2018

In 'Anil Kumar Singhal vs. ITO', 33 taxman.com434 (Agra Trib) (SMC Bench), ITAT upheld the initiation of proceedings under section 148 of the Act after having found that after receipt of report from the Investigation Wing, the AO had applied his mind to such information and had then issued the notice to the assessee. No issue of non-application of mind by the AO, however, stands raised in the present case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Agra Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Avnindra Mishra, Mathura vs Ito-1(3)(1), Mathura on 5 July, 2018

In 'Anil Kumar Singhal vs. ITO', 33 taxman.com434 (Agra Trib) (SMC Bench), ITAT upheld the initiation of proceedings under section 148 of the Act after having found that after receipt of report from the Investigation Wing, the AO had applied his mind to such information and had then issued the notice to the assessee. No issue of non-application of mind by the AO, however, stands raised in the present case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Agra Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ghanshyam , Mathura vs Ito 3(2), Mathura on 19 June, 2018

In 'Anil Kumar Singhal vs. ITO', 33 taxman.com434 (Agra Trib) (SMC Bench), ITAT upheld the initiation of proceedings under section 148 of the Act after having found that after receipt of report from the Investigation Wing, the AO had applied his mind to such information and had then issued the notice to the assessee. No issue of non-application of mind by the AO, however, stands raised in the present case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Agra Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Vidhya Agarwal, Agra vs I.T.O., Ward-4(4), Agra on 22 March, 2019

In the, case of 'Anil Kumar Singhal Vs. ITO', in ITA No.408 & 413/Agra of 2012 the ITAT, (SMC), Agra, in respect of reasons as held the reopening to be valid for the reason that the facts of the case under consideration were identical to the facts of the case of 'Brij Mohan Agarwal Vs. ACIT' (supra) which, as discussed, has no application to the facts of the present case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Agra Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1