Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 565 (0.75 seconds)
Documents citing The Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... vs T. Adinarayan Setty on 7 November, 1958

Shri. Het Ram (Deceased) Through Lrs & ... vs . Union Of India & Anr. on 20 December, 2022

payable to the owner of the land is the market value which is determined by reference to the price which a seller might reasonably expect to obtain from a willing purchaser, bat as this may not be possible to ascertain with any amount of precision, the authority charged with the duty to award compensation is bound to make an estimate judged by an objective standard. The land acqui red has, therefore, to be valued not only with reference to its condition at the time of the declaration under section 4 of the Act but its potential value also must be taken into account. The sale­deeds of the lands situated in the vicinity and the comparable benefits and advantages which they have, furnish a rough and ready method of computing the market value. This, however, is not the only method. The rent which an owner was actually receiving at the relevant point of time or the rent which the neighbouring lands of similar nature are fetching can be taken into account by capitalising the rent which according to the present prevailing rate of interest is 20 times the annual rent. But this also is not a conclusive method.This Court had in Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore v. T. Adinarayan Setty(1), indicated at page 412 the methods of valuation to be adopted in ascertaining the market value of the land on the date of the notificatioa under section 4(1) which are : (i) opinion of experts, (ii) the price paid within a reasonable time in bona fide transactions of purchase ,of the lands acquired or the lands adjacent to the lands acquired and possessing similar advantages; and (iii) a number of years' purchase of the actual or immediately prospective profits of the lands acquired. These methods, however, do not preclude the Court from taking any other special circumstances into consideration, the requirement being always to arrive as near as possible an estimate of the market value. In arriving to a reasonably correct market value, it may be necessary to take even two or all of those methods into account inasmuch as the exact valuation is not always possible as no two lands may be the same either in respect of the situation or the extent or the potentially nor is it possible in all cases to have reliable material from which that valuation can be accurately determined."
Delhi District Court Cites 55 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Asst. Commissioner vs Smt. Kamalabai Kom Laxman Metri on 20 June, 1997

In Spl. Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore v. T. Adinarayan Setty (supra), deduction of 25 percent was held to be reasonable. It is to be noted that in building Regulations, setting apart the lands for development of roads, drainage and other amenities like electricity, etc. are condition precedent to approve lay out for building colonies. Therefore, based upon the situation of the land and the need for development the deduction shall be made. Where acquired land is in the midst of already developed land with amenities of roads, drainage, electricity etc. then deduction of 1/3 would not be justified. In the rural areas housing schemes relating to weaker sections deduction of 1/4 may be justified.
Karnataka High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - P V Shetty - Full Document

The Project Director vs M.Vijayalakshmi on 13 February, 2020

80.In Special Land Acquisition Officer vs. T.Adhinarayan Shetty reported in AIR 1959 SC 429, the Hon'ble Supreme Court pointed out the broad methods of valuation to be, opinion of experts, price of purchase of lands possessing similar advantage in bonafide transaction within reasonable time and number of years purchase of the actual or immediately prospective projects of the lands acquired.
Madras High Court Cites 104 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next