Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 77 (0.99 seconds)
Documents citing Mehar Chand vs State Of H. P. And Ors on 6 January, 2021

Tara Devi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors on 23 December, 2025

not been disputed, rather an attempt has been made to refute the claim of the petitioner on the ground that he has not completed ten years regular service as is required under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 for grant of pension. Since it is not in dispute, rather it is an admitted of fact that besides petitioner's having rendered more than 9 years, 8 months and 18 days of regular service, he had also rendered service of rt Whole Time Contingent Paid w.e.f 10.08.2009 till 12.05.2011 i.e. one year and nine months, afore service is also required to be taken into consideration for the purpose of computing qualifying service. If it is so, total regular service rendered by the petitioner would come out to 10 years and 7 months and in that eventuality, petitioner would be entitled to pension. At this stage, it would be apt to take note of relevant paras of judgment passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mehar Chand (supra):-
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document

Pradesh vs District Collector And Others on 24 November, 2021

had agreed to deposit a sum of Rs. 97.75 lacs as against the total amount of Rs. one crore 30 lacs. She further submits that symbolic possession of the property in question has already been taken and actual possession is likely to be taken over by tomorrow. She further submits that the writ petition may not be entertained since the petitioner has an alternative remedy. She has relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in case titled as C Bright versus District Collector and others, reported in (2021) 2 SCC 392 and the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 1365 of 2020, titled as Mehar Chand versus State of H.P. & others and the various judgments of the Supreme Court relied upon therein. She also submits that in view of the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgments, the petitioner has an alternative remedy under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal at Chandigarh.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Sabina - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next