Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.46 seconds)

Ashoka Marketing Ltd. vs Addl. Registrar Of Companies on 2 March, 1983

5. The learned advocate for the petitioner has elaborated the aforesaid points and jetted on the decision in the case of Mahalderam Tea Estate Ltd. v. D.N. Prodhan [1979] 49 Comp Cas 529 ; 1978 CHN 336, in relation to the first point, the decision in the case of Pyarchand Kesarimal Potwal Bidi Factory v. Onkar Laxman Thenge , in connection with the third point and the decision in the case of Registrar of Companies v. Bharat Produce Co. Ltd. [1980] 50 Comp Cas 250 (Cal), in support of the fourth point.
Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fenner (India) Ltd. And Others vs Additional Registrar Of Companies on 3 February, 1994

11. Learned counsel had rightly pointed that the provisions made in section 310 of the Act are similar to section 263 and hence the ratio of this decision is applicable to the case on hand. He further relined upon the decision in Registrar of Companies v. Bharat Produce Co. Ltd. [1980] 50 Comp Cas 250 (Cal), in which the Calcutta High Court had occasion to consider the scope of section 269(2) of the Act. Section 269(2) of the Act reads as follows :
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - P Singh - Full Document
1