Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.88 seconds)
Documents citing Johnson Jacob vs State on 4 July, 2022

Dr Hamidullah Bhat vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 13 October, 2023

In view of the aforesaid, reliance placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on Captain Arvind Kathpalia (supra) and Johnson Jacob (supra) is misplaced, as the situation/position in both are not the same/identical particularly, in view of the fact when the Ld. Special Judge, (PC Act) vide orders dated 29.01.2008 and 20.03.2010, did not CRL. M.C. No. 2585/2021 Page 9 of 10 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:19.10.2023 18:11:58 accept the closure reports filed by the CBI and thus directed for carrying out further investigation on the suggested parameters, whereas in both aforesaid cases, the DE and the criminal proceedings were based on the same set of facts, which, is not the case in hand.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tejinder Singh Wadhwan vs State on 3 July, 2024

M). Because the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi by Judgment dated 04.07.2022 in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 1279 of 2021 Johnson Jacob versus State held that "20. However, I am of the view that when departmental proceedings and the criminal proceedings are a mirror image of each other and the accused has been exonerated on merits in the departmental inquiry, and not due to minor technicalities or irregularities, the criminal proceedings, on the same set of facts and circumstances, cannot be permitted to be continued as the standard of proof in departmental proceedings is much lower than the standard of proof in criminal proceedings.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1