Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (1.65 seconds)
Documents citing Seema Grover Seth vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 8 November, 2011

Union Of India vs M.L. Gupta & Ors. on 7 June, 2019

In relation to this aspect, in view of the verdict of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "State of Uttranchal and Ors. Vs. Sunil Kumar Vaish and Ors." 2011 (9) SCALE 131 and the verdict of this Court in "Seema Grover Seth Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors." in W.P.(C)13122/2009 and "Govt. of NCT of Delhi Vs. Sanjay Grover & Anr." in W.P.(C)13888/2009 dated 08.11.2011, wherein it has been observed to the effect that an endeavour ought to be made by the Court to decide the matter in controversy finally, rather than remanding the matters, it is considered appropriate to dispose of the appeal rather than remanding back the matter for recording of any additional evidence.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 13 - A Malhotra - Full Document

Sh.Chandra Pratap Singh vs Union Of India on 24 May, 2014

In the opinion of this Court the ratio of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in the case of Seema Grover (supra) is that it is permissible to apply circle rates under the provisions of the Stamp Act to arrive at the market value of an instrument for the purposes of assessment of stamp duty payable in respect of transactions relating to immovable properties. If the circle rates are prescribed at a time after execution of an instrument, it is open for the Collector to grant appropriate reduction to the circle rates to arrive at the market value keeping in consideration the time lag between execution of the instrument and notification of the circle rates.
Delhi District Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhupender Kumar Jain vs Union Of India on 28 August, 2015

36. The Ld. ADJ­01 in the judgment titled as Chandra Pratap Singh v. Union of India & Anr. has relied upon one another judgment as Seema Grover v. Government of NCT of Delhi, writ petition (C) 13122/09 decided on 08.11.2011, wherein Page No.21 of 24 LAC Nos.13/1/08/06, 28/1/08/06, 19/1/08/06, 18/1/08/06 & 16/1/08/08 the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had held that act of the registry in dealing the reduction in 20% per year, which was notified on 18.07.2007 was proper as such mode of valuation was not unknown.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh.Mahender Kumar vs Union Of India on 27 August, 2015

40. The Ld. ADJ­01 in the judgment titled as Chandra Pratap Singh v. Union of India & Anr. has relied upon one another judgment as Seema Grover v. Government of NCT of Delhi, writ petition (C) 13122/09 decided on 08.11.2011, wherein the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had held that act of the registry in dealing the reduction in 20% per year, which was notified on 18.07.2007 was proper as such mode of valuation was not unknown.
Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Farzand Ali vs Union Of India on 27 August, 2015

40. The Ld. ADJ­01 in the judgment titled as Chandra Pratap Singh v. Union of India & Anr. has relied upon one another judgment as Seema Grover v. Government of NCT of Delhi, writ petition (C) 13122/09 decided on 08.11.2011, wherein the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had held that act of the registry in dealing the reduction in 20% per year, which was notified on 18.07.2007 was proper as such mode of valuation was not unknown.
Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Anand Prakash Gupta vs Union Of India on 27 August, 2015

42. The Ld. ADJ­01 in the judgment titled as Chandra Pratap Singh v. Union of India & Anr. has relied upon one another judgment as Seema Grover v. Government of NCT of Delhi, writ petition (C) 13122/09 decided on 08.11.2011, wherein the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had held that act of the registry in dealing the reduction in 20% per year, which was notified on 18.07.2007 was proper as such mode of valuation was not unknown.
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Bhupender Kumar Jain vs Union Of India on 27 August, 2015

40. The Ld. ADJ­01 in the judgment titled as Chandra Pratap Singh v. Union of India & Anr. has relied upon one another judgment as Seema Grover v. Government of NCT of Delhi, writ petition (C) 13122/09 decided on 08.11.2011, wherein the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had held that act of the registry in dealing the reduction in 20% per year, which was notified on 18.07.2007 was proper as such mode of valuation was not unknown.
Delhi District Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh.Chander Prakash Gupta vs Union Of India on 27 August, 2015

40. The Ld. ADJ­01 in the judgment titled as Chandra Pratap Singh v. Union of India & Anr. has relied upon one another judgment as Seema Grover v. Government of NCT of Delhi, writ petition (C) 13122/09 decided on 08.11.2011, wherein the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had held that act of the registry in dealing the reduction in 20% per year, which was notified on 18.07.2007 was proper as such mode of valuation was not unknown.
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Manjit Singh vs Union Of India on 26 August, 2016

48.   The Ld. ADJ­01 in the judgment titled as Chandra Pratap Singh  v. Union  of  India  & Anr. has  relied  upon  one  another judgment  of  Seema  Grover  v. Government  of  NCT  of  Delhi, writ petition (C) 13122/09 decided on 08.11.2011, wherein the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had held that act of the registry in dealing the reduction in 20% per year, which was notified on 18.07.2007   was   proper,   as   such   mode   of   valuation   was   not unknown.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next