Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Kovvuri Thirujpathi Raju vs Kovvuri Venkataraju, Minor By His ... on 21 September, 1916

B. Lallo Singh vs Jamna Prasad on 28 February, 1940

In Thirupathi Raju v. Venkataraju (1918) 5 AIR Mad 1038, it was held by a Bench of the Madras High Court that a suit by a member of a joint Hindu family for possession of property alienated by the manager during the plaintiff's minority, describing himself as the guardian of the minor, is not a suit to set aside a sale by a guardian to which Article 44, Limitation Act, applies, but is one for possession of immovable property within the meaning of Article 144.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kanna Panikkar And Ors. vs Nanchan And Ors. on 5 December, 1923

[Kovvuri Thirupathi Raju v. Kovvuri Venkataraju (1917) 40 IC 418 and Genes ha Iyer v. Amirthaswami Odayar(1918) MWN 892]. The principle that underlies the construction put forward by Mr. T.R. Ramachandra Iyer is that parties are bound by their own acts until they are set aside or cancelled, but minors cannot act and therefore the mere addition of their names in the document cannot make the document their act which must be set aside.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1