Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing Income Tax Contingent Employees Union vs A.N. Jha on 17 November, 2021

Tc Gupta vs Union Of India on 24 March, 2022

6. This Court has noticed in more than one matters that the petitioner Advocate has indulged in filing Original Applications in the Tribunal and writ petitions in this Court and personaly signs (Downloaded on 24/03/2022 at 08:33:28 PM) (4 of 5) [CW-10645/2019] the pleadings etc. without having been specifically authorised in this regard by the litigants. Reference in this regard may be had to the Judgment dated 17.11.2021 passed by this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2893/2019 (Income Tax Contingent Union & Anr. vs. A.N. Jha & Anr. wherein, it was observed:
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

T.C. Gupta vs Union Of India on 31 August, 2022

Considering the nature of allegations levelled by the petitioner in the original application filed by him in the Tribunal, extracts whereof have been reproduced in the order dated 24.03.2022 passed by this Court and so also the substance of allegations attributed to him by the learned Members of the Tribunal in the order dated 23.05.2019 passed by the Tribunal, we are of the firm view that the conduct of the petitioner advocate is reprehensible and contemnous. By no stretch of imagination, contemnous acts of the petitioner be condoned. He has filed pleadings before the Tribunal in reference to an order dated 19.03.2015 passed by Division Bench of this Court by naming the (Downloaded on 31/08/2022 at 10:52:10 PM) (5 of 6) [WCP-491/2022] Hon'ble Judges and has branded the order to be perverse, absurd, senseless, without application of mind and contemptuous as per the definition of contempt given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Apparently thus, the petitioner has no respect for the sanctity of the Court. By using such intemperate demeaning language, the petitioner has scandalized and lowered this Court's dignity. By quoting the names of Hon'ble Judges in the pleadings filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal and branding the judgment to be absurd, senseless and contemnous, the petitioner has committed gross contempt of this Court. We are constrained to make the above observations keeping in view the fact that this is not the only instance of the petitioner indulging into these kinds of activities. We may state here that in D.B. Review Petition (Writ) No.159/2021 (Income Tax Contingent Employees Union & Anr. vs A.N. Jha & Anr.), the petitioner made disparaging personal remarks against the Judges who passed the order dated 17.11.2021. When he was confronted with these allegations, he candidly conceded that he had made a mistake and pleaded that he may be allowed to withdraw the review application which was dismissed as such on 02.08.2022.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suo Moto vs T.C. Gupta on 31 August, 2022

Considering the nature of allegations levelled by the petitioner in the original application filed by him in the Tribunal, extracts whereof have been reproduced in the order dated 24.03.2022 passed by this Court and so also the substance of allegations attributed to him by the learned Members of the Tribunal in the order dated 23.05.2019 passed by the Tribunal, we are of the firm view that the conduct of the petitioner advocate is reprehensible and contemnous. By no stretch of imagination, contemnous acts of the petitioner be condoned. He has filed pleadings before the Tribunal in reference to an order dated 19.03.2015 passed by Division Bench of this Court by naming the (Downloaded on 31/08/2022 at 10:53:30 PM) (5 of 6) [WCP-491/2022] Hon'ble Judges and has branded the order to be perverse, absurd, senseless, without application of mind and contemptuous as per the definition of contempt given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Apparently thus, the petitioner has no respect for the sanctity of the Court. By using such intemperate demeaning language, the petitioner has scandalized and lowered this Court's dignity. By quoting the names of Hon'ble Judges in the pleadings filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal and branding the judgment to be absurd, senseless and contemnous, the petitioner has committed gross contempt of this Court. We are constrained to make the above observations keeping in view the fact that this is not the only instance of the petitioner indulging into these kinds of activities. We may state here that in D.B. Review Petition (Writ) No.159/2021 (Income Tax Contingent Employees Union & Anr. vs A.N. Jha & Anr.), the petitioner made disparaging personal remarks against the Judges who passed the order dated 17.11.2021. When he was confronted with these allegations, he candidly conceded that he had made a mistake and pleaded that he may be allowed to withdraw the review application which was dismissed as such on 02.08.2022.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Home Gaurds Sainik Avam Pariwar Kalyan ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 June, 2022

In absence of any resolution, authorizing the petitioner to file this petition, the same is not maintainable, in view of the judgement passed by Division Bench in the case of Income Tax Contingent Employees Union & Anr. Vs. A.N Jha & Another passed in Civil Writ Petition No.2893 of 2019, decided on 17.11.2011 and in the case of Income Tax Contingent Employees Union Vs. Union of India and other passed in Civil Writ Petition No.3798 of 2019, decided on 09.07.2019, whereby this Court has held that such writ petitions are not maintainable for lack of proper authorization.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - R Malimath - Full Document
1