Shri Deepak Malik vs Govt. Of Nct Delhi on 10 April, 2015
19. For the self-same reasons, the decision of this Court in Kewal Kumar (supra) is also not attracted.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.61 seconds)Documents citing
Union Of India vs Kewai, Kumar on 12 April, 1993
Shri Deepak Malik vs Govt. Of Nct Delhi on 10 April, 2015
19. For the self-same reasons, the decision of this Court in Kewal Kumar (supra) is also not attracted.
A V Prem Nath vs Uoi And Ors on 25 May, 2023
(ii) The next authority relied upon by respondent no.3 is Union of
India vs. Kewal Kumar, 1993 (3) SCC 204 , wherein it was held that
where the CBI had recorded the FIR and had sent the same to the
higher authorities for taking action and the competent authority has
taken a decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings, so in that sealed
cover procedure is to be followed.
Union Of India & Ors vs Sangram Keshari Nayak on 27 April, 2007
For the self-same reasons, the decision of this Court in Kewal Kumar
(supra) is also not attracted.
Mahavir Singh vs Dda & Ors on 3 December, 2012
(1) Union of India & Ors. Vs. K.V. Janakiraman & Ors. (1991 (4) SCC 109):
(2) Union of India Vs. Kewal Kumar (1993 (3) SCC 204);
(3) Delhi Development Authority Vs. H.C. Khurana (1993 (3) SCC 196);
(4) Union of India & Anr. Vs. R.S. Sharma (2000 (4) SCC 394);
(5) DDA Vs. Y.L. Banka & Ors. (LPA No.95/96).
Ramesh Prasad Singh vs Nation Highways Authority Of India on 11 December, 2013
14. It was submitted that the promotion is not a fundamental right, and cannot be asked as a matter of right. The suitability and eligibility of the candidate concerned is best left at the hands of the Departmental Promotion Committee or the Search-cum-Selection Committee. It was submitted that due procedure had been followed in this case, and the respondents had relied upon the cases, namely, Union of India & Anr. vs. R.S.Sharma [(2000) 4 SCC 394]; Delhi Development Authority v. H.C.Khurana [(1993) 3 SCC 195]; Union of India v. Kewal Kumar [(1993) 3 SCC 204] & Union of India & Ors. V. Sangram Keshari Nayak [(Appeal (Civil) 3691 of 2005]. Other grounds taken by the applicant were vehemently denied and it was prayed that the OA is not maintainable either on facts or in law.
Constable Dharam Pal vs The Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 August, 2013
19. For the self-same reasons, the decision of this Court in Kewal Kumar
(supra) is also not attracted.
Asha Verma vs State Of U.P.,Thru. Prin. Secy.,Mahila ... on 18 April, 2013
Para 6- The learned counsel for the appellant also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in Union of India v. Kewal Kumar (1993) 3 SCC 204.
Pritam Das Geryani vs National Ins. Co. Ltd. & Ors on 6 February, 2017
Reliance was placed on the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Union of India vs. Kewal Kumar : (1993) 3 SCC 204;
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Qimat Rai Gupta & Ors. :
Union Of India Through The Secretary, ... vs V. Appalla Raju on 30 January, 2017
17. We may also point out, in this context, that in Delhi
Development Authority v. H.C. Khurana (1993) 3 SCC 196 and
Union of India v. Kewal Kumar 1993) 3 SCC 204 this Court found
that the ratio in Jankiraman 1991) 4 SCC 109 is applicable only to
the situations similar to the cases discussed therein, and hence the
Sealed Cover Procedure resorted to by DPC in those two cases was
upheld by this Court."