Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.36 seconds)
Documents citing Mohini Sugar Mills Ltd. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 14 April, 1966

Ralchem vs Ajit on 29 April, 2011

32. A division bench of the Patna High Court in Mohini Sugar Mills Vs. State of Bihar reported in 1967 II LLJ 209 opined that if the Government makes a reference under S.10 by including in it several items in dispute between the employer and the employees, and if the Tribunal concerned holds that, in respect of some items in dispute, the order of reference is incompetent, the tribunal itself must refuse to give any decision on those points and confine its Award only to those disputes in respect of which a valid reference is made and it has jurisdiction to adjudicate on the same.
Gujarat High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - H K Rathod - Full Document

United vs Commissioner on 26 April, 2010

32. A division bench of the Patna High Court in Mohini Sugar Mills Vs. State of Bihar reported in 1967 II LLJ 209 opined that if the Government makes a reference under S.10 by including in it several items in dispute between the employer and the employees, and if the Tribunal concerned holds that, in respect of some items in dispute, the order of reference is incompetent, the tribunal itself must refuse to give any decision on those points and confine its Award only to those disputes in respect of which a valid reference is made and it has jurisdiction to adjudicate on the same.
Gujarat High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 0 - H K Rathod - Full Document

Pradeep Stainless India Pvt. Ltd vs The Joint Commissioner Of Labour on 18 February, 2010

32.A division bench of the Patna High Court in Mohini Sugar Mills Vs. State of Bihar reported in 1967 II LLJ 209 opined that if the Government makes a reference under S.10 by including in it several items in dispute between the employer and the employees, and if the Tribunal concerned holds that, in respect of some items in dispute, the order of reference is incompetent, the tribunal itself must refuse to give any decision on those points and confine its Award only to those disputes in respect of which a valid reference is made and it has jurisdiction to adjudicate on the same.
Madras High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 2 - K Chandru - Full Document
1