Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)
Documents citing Suresh Rajaram Kadam And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra Thru Gp And Ors on 15 January, 2019

Hitesh S/O. Ashok Mahajan vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Jaripatka, ... on 21 August, 2021

Likewise, on the same point, reliance has been placed on the decision of this Court in the case of Sheetal Rajaram Kadam vs. State of Maharashtra 2015 ALL MR (Cri) 2930 . In both these cases, it has been ruled that a mere breach of promise to marry could not be said to be a false promise. In order to establish a false promise, the maker of the promise should have had no intention of keeping his word.
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V G Joshi - Full Document

Arti D/O Ashokrao Mahajan And 2 Others vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Jaripatka ... on 22 April, 2024

In this regard our attention has been invited to the decision of this Court in case of Sheetal Rajaram Kadam vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.(Criminal Apeal No.668/2015) dated 14.07.2015, wherein (paragraph 13) this Court took a note of the profession of the victim as a Nurse and under circumstances observed that it is difficult to believed that such a medically education lady had pills without her 5 929.apl.1084.2023.odt wish or knowing the consequences. The learned Counsel for the applicants further relied on the decision of this Court in case of Shantaram Krishna Karkhandis and anr. vs. State of Maharashtra and anr. 2006 ALL MR (Cri.) 2856 to contend that in order to establish the offence punishable under Section 313 of the IPC, it is essential to establish that the pills were administered without the consent of the victim. In this regard it is submitted that in the meeting there was talk between the family members, which was followed by the victim consuming the pills.
Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - V G Joshi - Full Document
1