Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.38 seconds)
Documents citing Landmark Cars Pvt. Ltd. vs Frostees Export (India) Pvt. Ltd. & 5 ... on 30 June, 2020

Rama Motocorp Private Limited vs M/S Gannayak Cars Private Limited on 14 November, 2025

M/s. Gannayak Cars Private Limited & Ors. 14/11/2025 Shanti Developers and Ors. (2020) 2 SCC 26; National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Harsolia Motors & Ors., (2023) 8 SCC 362 and Hon'ble National Commission in Landmark Cars Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Frostees Export (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., MANU/CF/0559/2020 and argued that the car was purchased by the complainant for personal use of its Director and in such a situation the company is qualified to approach Consumer Commission as a consumer under the Act.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Maa Harsiddhi Infra Developers ... vs Ford India Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. on 19 May, 2023

for earning profit. Though, in reply to para No. 3. e. of the complaint, the opposite party No.1 has stated that each and every time when they wanted to contact the complainant, the same could be done only through H R department of the company, which shows that the vehicle was used for official/commercial purpose. Whereas the opposite party No.2 has denied the statement of the complainant made in paragraph No. 3.e., on the ground that the complainant is a company involved in building constructions and civil engineering at large scale and the vehicle was used for attending meeting with Govt. Officials for obtaining tenders /contracts etc. We have considered the contention made in the complaint, the written version, the arguments advanced by all parties in this regard. We are not impressed with the reasons and arguments advanced by the opposite parties in this regard. Merely doing correspondence through H R department of the company and doing business by the company at large scale or traveling in the vehicle in question by the Director of company cannot oust the complainant from the purview of definition of „consumer‟ as per discussion and settled principle in Landmark Cars Pvt. Ltd. (supra) case by the Hon‟ble National Commission. Hence, we are of the considered view that the complainant very well comes under the purview of „consumer‟ and decide this issue in favour of the complainant.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1