Divisional Forest Officer (Authorised ... vs Laxman Pratap Ray Alias Lakshman on 16 January, 1991
In fact,-unlike Section 320, Cr.P.C.-no permission of the authorised officer or the District Court is envisaged because no compounding is contemplated at the stage when the matter is before the authorised officer or the District Court In this behalf, we agree with the reasoning of Ramachandra Raju, J. in Public Prosecutor v. K. Mahboob, 1982(1) APU 20.