citedby: 240374

The Chairman vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 25 February, 2020

************** [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice] Even though the challenge raised in the present writ petition is to declare the impugned Act as invalid, yet the petition does not survive in respect of the said challenge, as the issue has been finally determined by a Division Bench of this Court in a batch of Writ Petitions in W.P.No.18008 of 2018, etc. batch [Monfort Academy Matriculation 2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.(MD)No.7307 of 2019 Higher Secondary School Vs. the Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Chennai, and others], decided on 13.09.2019. However, while upholding the Act in paragraph No.46 of the judgment, the Division Bench further indicated that the Court is not going into the quantum of enhancement of tax. It was left open to the institution to file appropriate petition challenging the same.

Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Prasad - Full Document

A.Kingsly Belbin vs The Secretary To The Government on 22 June, 2021

In support of his contention, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relied on the order of this Court in W.P(MD)No. 11501 of 2008, dated 20.09.2010 (Management of RC School Vs. Director of Elementary Education and another) and the Judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A(MD)Nos.22 and 23 of 2017, dated 20.02.2018 (The Secretary, School Education Department and others Vs. The Correspondent, R.C.Middle School, Nedunkulam, Tuticorin District) and the order of the Division Bench of this Court in W.P(MD)No.24071 of 2017, dated 20.02.2018 (The Secretary, Guruvappa Higher Secondary School, Niekarapatti Vs. The Secretary, Department of School Education and others) and submitted that the Division Bench permitted the Management to convert the post of vocational Instructor of a particular subject into any other subject depending upon the need of the students and the School. The fourth respondent erroneously rejected the proposal citing G.O(Ms)No.39, 4/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.18114 of 2018 School Education (D1) Department, dated 21.03.2003 and denied the approval and prayed for allowing the Writ Petition.

Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V M Velumani - Full Document

G.Munusamy vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 18 April, 2022

integra. The Hon'ble Division Bench of Madurai in the order dated 04.08.2008 passed in WA.(MD).No.308 of 2008, had approved such an appointment from the date of initial appointment. Following such decision, the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of 'Thiruvalluvar Higher Secondary School Vs. The Government of India, Department of Education and others' reported in '2008 (5) CTC 648', had taken a similar view that after lifting of the ban, approval of appointment to a non-teaching post in an aided school, requires to be made from the date of his initial appointment. The relevant portion of the order reads as follows:-

Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 4 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

V.Parthasarathy vs The Secretary To Government on 13 March, 2013

5. Therefore, it is submitted that even though the writ petition was dismissed by this Court on 15.02.2011, it would not in any manner affect the case of the petitioner as the points canvassed in the writ petition have not been dealt with. Further, the learned counsel submitted that this Court by an order dated 12.04.2006 allowed another writ petition in W.P.No.11650 of 2006 (Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary School Headmasters Association, Ambasamudram, vs. The Secretary to Government and others), based on the stand taken in the counter affidavit and the said order was also implemented and the pension was revised for the three incumbents covered in the said order, by the order of the Accountant General dated 23.03.2006. Therefore, it is submitted that the stand taken by the respondents to deny the petitioners benefit is illegal.

Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

Holy Family Convent Matriculation vs The Government Of Tamilnadu on 14 September, 2016

4. The matter relates to the extension of Employees State Insurance Scheme to the private educational institutions. In fact, in a batch of cases, various other Institutions have also challenged the very same Government Order and the consequential proceedings of the ESI Corporation. The said writ petitions and writ appeals were clubbed together and posted before the Hon'ble First Bench of this Court in WA.No.918/2013 etc., batch [TAMIL NADU NURSERY, PRIMARY, MATRICULATION AND HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS Vs. THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS] and the Hon'ble First Bench of this Court by a common judgment and order dated 16.06.2015, disposed of the writ appeals and writ petitions on the following terms :-

Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N Kirubakaran - Full Document

Annai Veilankannis College For vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 6 October, 2016

2.The petitioners are Annai Veilankanni's Group of Colleges, started by Annai Veilankanni's Educational and Charitable Society, a Society registered in the year 1988. The challenge in these writ petitions is to a Government Order in G.O.(Ms)No.237, Labour and Employment (K1) Department, dated 26.11.2010. An identical issue was considered by the First Bench of this Court, in a batch of cases in W.A.Nos.918 of 2013 and etc. batch dated 16.06.2015 (Tamil Nadu Nursery Primary Matriculation and Higher Secondary Schools, Managements Association and others V. Government of Tamil Nadu) and the Division Bench, after taking into consideration that the issue is now pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, disposed of the Appeals/Writ Petitions by passing the following order:

Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - N Kirubakaran - Full Document

Annai Veilankannis College For vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 6 October, 2016

2.The petitioners are Annai Veilankanni's Group of Colleges, started by Annai Veilankanni's Educational and Charitable Society, a Society registered in the year 1988. The challenge in these writ petitions is to a Government Order in G.O.(Ms)No.237, Labour and Employment (K1) Department, dated 26.11.2010. An identical issue was considered by the First Bench of this Court, in a batch of cases in W.A.Nos.918 of 2013 and etc. batch dated 16.06.2015 (Tamil Nadu Nursery Primary Matriculation and Higher Secondary Schools, Managements Association and others V. Government of Tamil Nadu) and the Division Bench, after taking into consideration that the issue is now pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, disposed of the Appeals/Writ Petitions by passing the following order:

Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - N Kirubakaran - Full Document

Presentation Nursery School vs Jai Bir Singh) on 28 January, 2016

3.The challenge in this writ petition is to a Government Order in G.O.(Ms)No.237, Labour and Employment (K1) Department, dated 26.11.2010. An identical issue was considered by the First Bench of this Court, in which, I was a party in a batch of cases in W.A.Nos.918 of 2013 and etc. batch dated 16.06.2015 (Tamil Nadu Nursery Primary Matriculation and Higher Secondary Schools, Managements Association and others V. Government of Tamil Nadu) and the Division Bench, after taking into consideration that the issue is now pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, disposed of the Appeals/Writ Petitions by passing the following order:

Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

Nehru Matriculation School vs Jai Bir Singh) on 28 January, 2016

2.The petitioner is an Educational Institution, started in the year 1997. The challenge in this writ petition is to a Government Order in G.O.(Ms)No.237, Labour and Employment (K1) Department, dated 26.11.2010. An identical issue was considered by the First Bench of this Court, in which, I was a party in a batch of cases in W.A.Nos.918 of 2013 and etc. batch dated 16.06.2015 (Tamil Nadu Nursery Primary Matriculation and Higher Secondary Schools, Managements Association and others V. Government of Tamil Nadu) and the Division Bench, after taking into consideration that the issue is now pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, disposed of the Appeals/Writ Petitions by passing the following order:

Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

St.Joseph Nursery & Nursery School vs The Principal Secretary on 17 February, 2016

3 The matter relates to the extension of Employees State Insurance Scheme to the private educational institutions. In fact, in a batch of cases, various other Institutions have also challenged the very same Government Order and the consequential proceedings of the ESI Corporation. The said writ petitions and writ appeals were clubbed together and posted before the Hon'ble First Bench of this Court in WA.No.918/2013 etc., batch [TAMIL NADU NURSERY, PRIMARY, MATRICULATION AND HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS Vs. THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS] and the Hon'ble First Bench of this Court by a common judgment and order dated 16.06.2015, disposed of the writ appeals and writ petitions on the following terms:-

Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results