Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.85 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Punjab & Ors vs Tara Singh Shahi on 17 April, 1996

State vs Tara Singh on 8 April, 2026

2. In order to prove its case, the prosecution examined PW-1 Sh. Parmarth Singh Chauhan, the complainant, whose examination-in-chief was partly recorded on 20.08.2024. In his examination-in-chief, PW-1 deposed that in the second week of February 2023, while he was returning home from the market, at about 11:30 PM when he reached Peshwa Road near Kendriya Bhandar, three boys suddenly grabbed him by the neck. He described the assailants broadly, one tall person wearing a black shirt and a dark-coloured cap, one of medium height wearing a green round-neck T-shirt, and one who was less tall and fair in complexion. He deposed that when grabbed, one of the three persons caught hold of both his hands while the others threatened him saying "whatever you have, give it to us, otherwise we will kill you." He stated that he tried to free himself but they held him tightly from his neck, causing him to gasp for breath and fall down, following which his FIR No. 45/2023 State Vs. Tara Singh Page No. 2 of 10 Digitally signed ravi by ravi Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sudhir Shahi vs State on 13 August, 2018

2. The revision petition arises out of the case FIR No. 595/2014 PS Najafgarh for the offences under sections 279 & 304 A IPC titled as State v. Sudhir Shahi registered on the basis complaint/tehrir dated 06.07.2014 of the complainant Shri Chhatrapati, wherein the complainant has stated that on 06.07.2014 he and his cousin Ram Kumar were going to Chhawla Stand, Najafgarh on their separate cycles and at about 10.20AM they reached in front of Metro Hospital, Chhawla Stand and the truck of Delhi Police bearing registration number DL 1G B 5197 hit cycle on which Shri Ram Kumar was riding as a result of which, Ram Kumar fell down and sustained injuries and he was taken to Metro Hospital and he was declared as brought dead.
Delhi District Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Prasad Vaishnav vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 June, 2025

12. Next judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellants State is the case of State of Punjab Vs. Tara Singh Shahi. (1996) 8 SCC 448. That is also a case of taking over staff of a private college by the State Government. Gift deed was executed between the parties whereby terms and conditions of the employees of private college were laid down and the Apex Court in Para 8 of the said judgment has held that gift deed in respect of the matter does not provide for applying rules for retirement at the age of 58 years. This judgment also depends upon the language of the gift deed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - M R Phadke - Full Document

H C Boken vs M/O Youth Affairs &Amp; Sports on 19 February, 2019

6. The applicants have relied upon the judgments by the Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Punjab v. Tara Singh Shahi, [(1996) 8 SCC 448] to claim that pension is admissible to them as the conditions prevailing, when NYKS was re-organized into an autonomous body in 1987, shall apply in their case. The relevant part of this 10 OA No.4177/2018 judgment reads as under:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S.Nagaraja Murugan vs Secretary To Government on 15 March, 2012

(vi) By relying upon Paragraphs 15 and 16 of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 1996 (8) SCC 448 [State of Punjab and others Vs. Tara Singh Shahi], the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 4, 6 to 10 and 13 to 15 submitted that the Rule of Equality do not envisage that a person, who is not qualified for appointment can still claim such appointment merely on the basis of Fundamental Rights available under Articles 14 and 16. He cannot, in fact, invoke the provisions of those Articles, as he has to first possess the essential qualification before invoking Rule of Equality.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jhamaklal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 January, 2020

12. Next judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellants State is the case of State of Punjab Vs. Tara Singh Shahi. (1996) 8 SCC 448. That is also a case of taking over staff of a private college by the State Government. Gift deed was executed between the parties whereby terms and conditions of the employees of private college were laid down and she Apex Court in Para 8 of the said judgment has held that gift deed in respect of the matter does not provide for applying rules for retirement at the age of 58 years. This judgment also depends upon the language of the gift deed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - S C Sharma - Full Document
1   2 3 Next