Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing Rajinder Singh Rana vs Uoi & Anr. on 8 September, 2010

Sh. Rajinder Singh vs Union Of India on 11 January, 2016

9. Respondent no.1/ Union of India filed written statement and taken Preliminary Objections that the Land Reforms Act is not applicable in the land in dispute. The LAC No. 110/11 Rajinder Singh vs. UOI & Anr. 4/10 petitioner is not a recorded owner, therefore, not entitled to claim compensation or enhancement. It is stated that the land is not surrounded by any developed or underdeveloped colony and can only be used for agriculture purposes. On merits, all the averments are denied. It is stated that the compensation has been legally and correctly assessed by LAC and the same is adequate and just. The conclusion arrived at by LAC is based upon cogent reasons and evidence, therefore, petitioner is not entitled for enhancement of compensation as alleged. It is stated that the petitioner is also not entitled for compensation of any loss of earnings.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sheo Dayal Gupta vs South East Central Railway on 25 August, 2023

10, From these observations it is evident that a person having disability shall not be offered a post drawing lesser pay than the pay scale which he was getting at the time w hen he acquired disability, In the case at hand, the applicant acquired the disability in the year 2000 which is not in dispute. It is also not in dispute that the applicant was offered a post drawing lesser pay than the pay he was getting at the time when he acquired disability. | Therefore, this action of the respondents WAS not In-consonance with Section 47 of the PW Act. We are, therefore, in agreement with the submissions advanced hy learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant should not have been offered a past drawing lesser pay. It is not the case of the respondents that the same post drawing the same pay scale was not available in the 7 OA.203/2022 department. Therefore, the action of the respondents in this respect cannot be sustained, il. In the case of Rajinder Singh Rana Vs, Union of India considered this aspect of the matter, Tt also considered the question of delay.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1