Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Gujarat vs Dinesh Chandra Harjibhai Patel on 22 March, 1993

State vs . Dinesh Chand Etc. on 23 October, 2007

11. Further, most important fact in this case is that the case property was produced in the court in unsealed condition and no specific mark was put on the cards as well as the currency notes which were seized on the alleged date of incident which creates a doubt whether such incident of apprehension of accused persons while playing gambling was occurred or not as such type of case property can easily be procured from market and specific identification mark should be put on the case property to make it State vs. Dinesh Chand etc. FIR No.268/00 8 different from similar kind of case property.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sombir vs The State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) on 20 October, 2012

In support of his arguments, Ld. Counsel for revisionist has relied upon the judgements reported as State of Gujarat Vs. Lakshman Mangaji Mena, 1998 CriL.J. 2161; B. Rajanna Vs. State of Karnataka, 1996 CriLJ 1820; Narata Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh, 1994 CriLJ 491, Crl Revision no. 107 to 113 of 1992 Crl. R. No. 46/12; Sombir Vs. State Page 3 of 5 decided on 27­05­1993; Sashidhara Kurup Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors, 1994 Cri.L.J. 375; State of Gujarat Vs. Dinesh Chandra Harjibhai Patel, 1994 CriLJ 1393.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Inderjeet Singh vs State on 13 July, 2016

That the appellant is law abiding and peace loving citizen and also a law follower person and he is an educated person and belongs to a reputed family and he is working in a reputed company. It was further stated that appellant had assisted the Trial Court and he had confessed before the trial Court that he had committed the above said offences which shows respect, in the mind of the appellant. It is stated that appellant is a young person and first time offender and he is not criminal and he had committed the abovesaid offences mistakenly and he had already apologized for it and it was stated further that he is sole bread earner of his family comprising of a very small child of two months. He had also placed reliance on the citation of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, titled as "State of Gujarat v. Dinesh Chandra Harjibhai Patel" reported as 1994 Crl. LJ 1393. However, the same is not aplicable to the facts of the case as no justifiable explanation for commission of the offence has come on record on part of the petitioner.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1