Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Priti Dash vs Abhimanyu Behera And Ors. on 6 March, 2000

Rameshwar Prasad Jat vs State Of Raj And Ors on 13 February, 2009

I have gone through the contents of the writ petition and in view of the fact that the controversy raised in this writ petition is covered by the judgment of Smt. Priti Dixist Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., the said writ petition is decided in terms of the judgment of Smt. Priti Dixist Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. The relevant paragraph 20,21 & 22 of the judgment of Smt. Priti Dixist Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. is as follows :-
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P S Asopa - Full Document

Bachhu Singh vs State Of Raj And Ors on 20 February, 2009

I have gone through the contents of the writ petition and in view of the fact that the controversy raised in this writ petition is covered by the judgment of Smt. Priti Dixist Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., the said writ petition is decided in terms of the judgment of Smt. Priti Dixist Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. The relevant paragraph 20,21 & 22 of the judgment of Smt. Priti Dixist Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. is as follows :-
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P S Asopa - Full Document

Sita Ram Sani vs State Of Raj And Ors on 13 February, 2009

I have gone through the contents of the writ petition and in view of the fact that the controversy raised in this writ petition is covered by the judgment of Smt. Priti Dixist Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., the said writ petition is decided in terms of the judgment of Smt. Priti Dixist Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. The relevant paragraph 20,21 & 22 of the judgment of Smt. Priti Dixist Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. is as follows :-
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P S Asopa - Full Document

Miss Sadhna Sood vs State Of Raj And Ors on 13 February, 2009

The grievance raised by the petitioner in this case is that pending litigation relating to the challenge of her selection as Para Teacher, she was not given appointment and after finalization of the same, she was given appointment from the subsequent date. Her initial date of appointment is 03.06.2002 and from that day she completed the 5 years requisite teaching experience. Counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is covered by the judgment of this Court dated 07.01.2009 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 5951/2008 and other connected writ petitions in para No. 34 and 35 titled as Smt. Priti Dixist Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. The relevant para 34 and 35 of the judgment is as follows :-
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - P S Asopa - Full Document
1