Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.28 seconds)

Noor Alam Khan vs Hasina Bano Noor Alam And Anr on 11 July, 2018

(e) The High Court of Punjab and Harayan in the case of Mukesh Kumar Vs. Rekha Rane and Ors.5, had observed that deductions that are made from the gross salary towards long term savings, which a person would get back at the end of his service and such as deductions towards General Provident Fund, General Group Insurance Scheme, L.I.C. Premium, State Life Insurance Loan can be deemed to be asset that he is creating for himself. In arriving at the income of the party only involuntary deductions like income tax, provident fund contributions etc. are to be excluded. Therefore, such deductions cannot be deducted or excluded from his salary while computing his means to pay maintenance;

Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - P D Naik - Full Document

A K Trivedi vs Pushpa Trivedi on 9 July, 2025

In judgment 'Mukesh Kumar Vs. Reka Rani & Anr' 2018 (3) RCR Criminal 135, it was held that a person can not be permitted to wriggle out or his statutory liability by way or taking huge loans and reducing the substantial amount of his salary for the payment of the same every month In his affidavit or income, respondent has also claimed that petitioner no. 1 is working and she has sufficient means to maintain CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 304/2025 Page 4 of 8 This is a digitally signed order.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document

Saroj Rani @ Rajni vs Mukesh Kumar on 9 November, 2023

1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for seeking transfer of the petition filed by respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, titled as " Mukesh Kumar Vs. Saroj Rani @ Rajni" pending in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Malerkotla, District Sangrur to any Court of Competent Jurisdiction at District Patiala.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1