Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.44 seconds)

Surinder Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 9 September, 2010

So far as the proposition of law laid down by the learned counsel for the petitioner as enunciated in authorities Hasanbhai Vallbhai Qureshi's case (super), Vikas Gupta's case (supra) ; Charanjit Singh @ Bittu's case (super) ; Reeta Nag 's case ( super); State of A.P. vs. A.S.Peter Rama Chaudhary's case (super) and Rukmini Narvekar's case (super) that police can make further investigation even after presentation of challan is concerned, there is no dispute with the said proposition of law. The question here is that after the presentation of supplementary challan under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C., whether the Court is bound to accept the same. The answer to that question is in negative.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - K C Puri - Full Document
1