Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Bihar Alloy Steels Ltd. vs Hori Shanker Worah (Properties) Ltd. ... on 10 September, 1986

Suresh Chaurasia vs Chandra Shekhar Burnwal on 10 July, 2025

"It is expected of the parties to raise necessary pleadings so as to enable the parties to adduce evidence and bring on record such relevant material as to enable the court forming an opinion on the issue as to comparative hardship and consistently with such finding whether partial eviction could meet the ends to justice. Even if no issue has been framed, the court may discharge its duty by taking into consideration such material as 8 Civil Revision No.118 of 2004 2025:JHHC:18792 available on record." The same principle has been propounded by the Hon'ble Patna High Court/Ranchi Bench in the case M/s Bihar Alloy Steels Limited Vs. Hari Shankar Worah (Properties) Ltd. &Ors., relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner at para 14 of the said judgment.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mostt. Beley Devi vs Mostt. Ramsakhi Devi & Anr. on 26 August, 2010

A Division Bench of this Court in the case of M/s Bihar Alloy Steel Limited v. Hari Shankar Worah (Properties) Limited and another, reported in 1987 Patna Law Journal Reports, 868, has taken notice of the provision, as contained in proviso to Section 11(1)(c) of the Act and has come to the conclusion that the Legislature has chosen to qualify the word, "satisfied" by the expression substantially, with a view to keep the interest of the tenant protected by providing occupation to him of the building in part, and granting to the landlord occupation to meet his reasonable requirement.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kishori Sah vs Atul Kumar Sahu on 23 February, 2011

A Division Bench of this Court in the case of M/s Bihar Alloy Steel Limited Vs. Hari Shankar Worah (Properties) Limited and another, reported in 1987 Patna Law Journal Reports, 868, has clearly stated that the Legislature has chosen to qualify the word „satisfied‟ by the 8 expression substantially with a view to keep the interest of the tenant protected by providing occupation to him of the building in part.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Ranjan - Full Document
1