Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 529 (0.58 seconds)

Bakhashi Ram And Others vs Satwant Singh Manak And Others on 26 November, 2013

The Code of Criminal Procedure prescribes the procedure to investigate into the cognizable offences defined under that Code as was the procedure set out in All India Institute of Medical Sharma Ravinder 2013.11.26 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA No. 153 of 2008 & connected appeals 51 Sciences Employees Vs. Union of India case (supra) and we have extracted the relevant paragraphs of the same.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Kethi Reddy Jagan Mohan Reddy, vs The Principal Secretary, Home ... on 12 November, 2018

Though it was faintly suggested that there was conflict in the views in All India Institute of Medical Sciences case (supra), Gangadhar case (supra), Hari Singh case (supra), Minu Kumari case (supra) and Ramesh Kumari case (supra), we find that the view expressed in Ramesh Kumari case (supra) related to the action required to be taken by the police when any cognizable offence is brought to its notice.
Telangana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Standard Chartered Bank vs Yogesh Sharma, Associate Professor, ... on 22 September, 2006

In Gangadhar Janardhan Mhatre's case (supra) Supreme Court relied on All India Institute Of Medical Sciences Employees' Union v. Union of India and Ors. 1997 SCC (Crl) 303 and in para 14 of the said case held that the writ applications were not the appropriate remedy without availing the remedy available and the appellant in that case could not have approached the High Court by filing a writ petition. In this case also the police has already filed a chargesheet.
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 5 - K Gambhir - Full Document

Shri Sunil Baburao Shegaonkar And Ors. vs Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal ... on 4 May, 2007

In para 5 of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Employees Union (Regd.) v. Union of India and Ors. (supra), the Supreme Court has observed thus: 5. In this case, the petitioner had not adopted either of the procedure provided under the Code. As a consequence, without availing of the above procedure, the petitioner is not entitled to approach the High Court by filing a writ petition and seeking a direction to conduct an investigation by the CBI which is not required to investigate into all or every offence. The High Court, therefore, though for different reasons, was justified in refusing to grant the relief as sought for.
Bombay High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - N Mhatre - Full Document

Potaraju Swamy S/O Kotlah , vs State Of Telangana, on 9 November, 2018

Though it was faintly suggested that there was conflict in the views in All India Institute of Medical Sciences case (supra), Gangadhar case (supra), Hari Singh case (supra), Minu Kumari case (supra) and Ramesh Kumari case (supra), we find that the view expressed in Ramesh Kumari case (supra) related to the action required to be taken by the police when any cognizable offence is brought to its notice.
Telangana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P.Pothu Raju, Guntur District vs Supt Of Police, Guntur District 4 Others on 6 December, 2018

Though it was faintly suggested that there was conflict in the views in All India Institute of Medical Sciences case (supra), Gangadhar case (supra), Hari Singh case (supra), Minu Kumari case (supra) and Ramesh Kumari case (supra), we find that the view expressed in Ramesh Kumari case (supra) related to the action required to be taken by the police when any cognizable offence is brought to its notice.
Telangana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next