Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (2.98 seconds)
Documents citing Ghaziabad Development Authority vs Balbir Singh on 3 December, 2004

Punjab Urban Planning & Development ... vs Gulshan Rai on 20 May, 2013

Whether a defaulting allottee of a public housing authority can legally be permitted by the consumer fora to lay the consequences of his own action/inaction at the door of the public housing authority contrary to the ratio of the Honble Supreme Courts judgment, inter alia, in Prashant Kumar Shahi Vs. Ghaziabad Development Authority (2000) 4 SCC 120 ; Ghaziabad Development Authority VS. Balbir Singh (2005) 9 SCC 573 and Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Syndicate Bank (2007) 6 SCC 711 ?
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Smt. Kusum Lata Vashisht vs Hp Housing Board & Anr. on 31 August, 2006

4. Looking to the mandate of the Supreme Court of India in CCI Chambers HSG Ltd. Vs. Development 2003 CTJ 849 SC (CP, Lucknow Development Authority Vs. M.K. Gupta (1994) 1 SCC 243, Gaziabad Development Authority Vs. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65 (first) and Gaziabad Development Authority Vs. Balbir Singh (2005) 9 SCC 573 (second) and also of the National Commission in the case of Hari Singh Vs. HP State and Ors, FA No. 472/97 decided on 21.2.2006, we are of the view that the impugned order needs to be set aside and case remanded back to the District Forum below with a direction to restore the appeal to its original number and date and then after hearing the parties again to dispose of the complaint without being influenced by anything said either it its earlier order, or by us in this order.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1