Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing Minder And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 25 April, 2014

Anita Devi vs Land Acquisition Collector And Ors on 11 December, 2019

A perusal of Ex.C-1 which was relied upon and is award titled as 'Minder Vs. State' and would go on to show that the site plan Ex.P-21 had been relied upon to come to the conclusion that villages Tigra and Nangli Umarpur were located close to each other and Badshahpur was located at a distance and on the Gurgaon-Sohna Road, which is N.H. No. 248-A. It was noticed that the Land Acquisition Collector had passed awards in favour of Tigra, Nangli Umarpur at Rs.1 crore and for Nangli Umarpur, Rs.4,688/- per square yard (Rs.2,25,93,120 per acre) had been awarded by the Reference Court.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Duli Chand & Ors vs Shri Bans Guru Gaddi Kabir Dharam Dass ... on 3 May, 2016

Mr. R.D.Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-defendant submits that ratio decidendi culled out by the Single Bench of this Court by applying the amended provisions caused by the State of Haryana in the Court Fee Act rendered in Beena and others vs. Rajinder Kumar and others 2006 (2) RCR (Civil) 449 is no longer a good law in view of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in Minder and others vs. State of Haryana and others 2014(3) R.C.R (Civil) 563, which has been rendered by relying upon ratio decidendi culled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh vs. Randhir Singh 2010(2) RCR (Civil) 564.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Rawal - Full Document

Joginder Singh vs Naveen Kumar And Anr on 25 October, 2016

I have heard learned counsel for parties and appraised the paper book and of the view that there is no force and merit in the submission of Mr. Manoj Kaushik, for, once person is a party to the sale deed, he has to pay the Court fees as per the sale consideration mentioned in the sale deed. As regards the possession also, matter was debated before the Division Bench of this Court in Minder and others Vs. State of Haryana and others, 2014(3) RCR (Civil) 563 by relying upon Suhrid's case (Supra), therefore, petitioner-plaintiff is required to pay the ad-valorem courts fees. Order under challenge is perfect, legal and justified.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Rawal - Full Document
1