Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 399 (1.25 seconds)
Documents citing People'S Union For Civil Liberties And ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 23 September, 2014

Sandeep Mawa vs Union Of India And Others on 21 December, 2020

3. Referring to the judgments of Hon‟ble the Supreme Court in People's Union for Civil Liberties v. State of Maharashtra (2014) 10 SCC 635, Extra Judicial Execution Victims Families Association v. Union of India (2017) 3 SCC (Cri) 622 and People's Union for Civil Liberties v. State of Maharastra (2014) 10 SCC 635, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the guidelines laid down therein by Hon‟ble the Supreme Court in exercise of powers under Section 142 of the Constitution of India are not being followed. The entire evidence will be destroyed, in case immediate action is not taken in the matter.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P K Gupta - Full Document

K.Kathiresan vs The State Of Tamilnadu on 14 August, 2018

The allegation of shooting at Theresapuram, which is 12 kms. away from the Collectorate having been resorted to, shortly after shooting was resorted to at Collectorate, is to be probed. Cases have to be registered against the authorities for offences u/s.302 IPC as also for other offences under the Indian Penal Code, Arms Act and such other acts as may be attracted. The dicta of the Supreme Court in People's Union for Civil Liberties and another v. State of Maharashtra and others [2014 (10) SCC 635] that ?13. (C) Whenever a specific complaint is made against the police alleging commission of a criminal act on their part, which makes out a cognizable case of culpable homicide, an FIR to this effect must be registered under appropriate sections of the IPC. Such case shall be investigated by State CB CID or any other specialized investigation agency? is to be strictly followed. The same would apply with equal force also in respect of allegations of grave wrong doing by officialdom in any form.
Madras High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 1 - C T Selvam - Full Document

Gaddam Laxman vs The State Of Telangana, Rep.By Its ... on 18 April, 2022

05. Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the considered view that in the counter-affidavit filed by the State, 1 (2014) 10 SCC 635 3 it was specifically stated that it has followed the guidelines as prescribed by the Apex Court in People' Union for Civil Liberties and another v. State of Maharashtra and others, no further orders need to be passed in the writ petition since crime is registered against the persons, who are responsible for the encounter.
Telangana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A K Shavili - Full Document

Arif Md Yeasin Jwadder vs The State Of Assam on 28 May, 2025

5.1. The Appellant in the Writ Petition filed before the High Court alleged that as many as 80 fake encounters took place in the State of Assam between May, 2021 and December, 2021. According to him, 1 People’s Union for Civil Liberties & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors, (2014) 10 SCC 635. Page 2 of 36 28 persons were killed and 48 were left injured, during these encounters. It was further alleged that police authorities have justified these actions on the basis that escape attempts from the accused persons prompted them to open fire in purported self- defence, resulting in death or injury.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Kant - Full Document

Tmt.R.Kasthuri vs State By on 19 December, 2014

(8) If the case relates to police encounter, as directed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in People's Union for Civil Liberties and another v. State of Maharashtra and others, 2014 (11) Scale 119 , the investigation shall be entrusted to either CB CID or a police team of another police station under the supervision of a senior police officer (at least a level above the head of the police party engaged in the encounter).
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Vinothini vs The State Rep. By Its on 6 December, 2023

25.By answering the above said issue, the Hon'ble Supreme Court thought it fit to follow the guidelines issued in People's Union for Civil Liberties and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others (2014)10 SCC 635 as noted above. The main challenge put before the Hon'ble Supreme Court is the directions issued to the Investigating Officer to register FIR under section 302 IPC against the police officials involved in the encounter killing. That was answered as noted above. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - G Ilangovan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next