Ashok Kumar Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 8 June, 2020
(4) (2008) 14 SCC 32 (Food Corporation of India and
Ors. vs. Pala Ram and Ors.) (Paragraph 46 and 47).
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (1.04 seconds)Documents citing
Food Corporation Of India & Anr vs Pala Ram & Ors on 16 May, 2008
Jagdish Mehto-Iii And Others vs . Ram Rattan And Others. on 24 February, 2010
Ramesh Kumar Sah vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 28 November, 2014
Again in case of Food Corporation of India v. Pala
Ram reported in (2008) 14 SCC 32 the Supreme Court held in
paragraph 47 that writ petition was not maintainable as series of
disputed questions of facts were raised.
Dhananjay Singh @ Dhananjay Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 28 November, 2014
Again in case of Food Corporation of India v. Pala
Ram reported in (2008) 14 SCC 32 the Supreme Court held in
paragraph 47 that writ petition was not maintainable as series of
disputed questions of facts were raised.
The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Ram Bahadur Thapa on 11 February, 2015
16. Again, in the case of Food Corporation of India
v. Pala Ram, reported in (2008) 14 SCC 32, the Supreme
Patna High Court LPA No.1157 of 2014 dt. 11-02-2015
9/10
Court, held, in paragraph 47, that writ petition was not
maintainable as a series of disputed questions of facts were
raised.
Binod Kumar Budhia vs The Bhagalpur Municipal Corporation & ... on 3 November, 2015
11. Again, in the case of Food Corporation of
India V. Pala Ram reported in (2008) 14 SCC 32, the
Supreme Court held, in paragraph 47, that writ petition was
not maintainable as a series of disputed questions of facts
were raised.
Unknown vs Union Of India & Others on 15 October, 2025
(iv) Food Construction of India & another vs. Pala
Ram & others; (2008) 14 SCC 32.
Ex-Servicemen Security Services vs The Regional Labour ... on 21 July, 2011
2. The very same judgment in Pala Ram's case records the fact that a
notification had been issued by the Central Government under Section 10 of
the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act subsequently permitting
contract labour for dusting, cleaning, sweeping and to do watch and ward
work since 28.05.1992, that is, subsequent to the institution of the writ
petition. It must be noticed that the petitioners were not seeking for
absorption in Food Corporation of India on abolition of contract labour.
They have only sought for quashing the circular issued by Food Corporation
of India acting on the notification issued by State Government. Apart from the
fact that State Government was not the 'appropriate Government' for Food
Corporation of India since 28.01.1986 and hence the State notification will
CWP No.8474 of 1991 (O&M) [4]
not govern Food Corporation of India, the notification issued on 28.05.1992
saves the day for the petitioner.
1