Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)

Navendu Babbar vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 18 June, 2020

(iv) Given this legal position, the nature of the offence committed necessarily has a limited role to play, while examining the merits of an application for bail. This is for a simple reason that the application being examined by the court is not for suspension of sentence, but for release during trial. If the court were to allow itself to be unduly influenced by the nature of the charges against the accused, and the seriousness of the crime alleged to have been committed by him, it would result in obliterating the distinction between grant of bail and suspension of sentence. Inasmuch as the applicant, in a bail application, has yet to be found guilty of the offence with which he is charged, the significance of the nature of the offence stand substantially reduced, while examining the application for bail. Courts have to be alive to the legal position - underscored in the very first paragraph of Dataram Singh (supra) - that every accused is presumed to be innocent until proved guilty.

Guru Jambheshwar University, ... vs S.M. College, Chandausi And 3 Others on 22 September, 2025

2. This special appeal is directed against an interim order dated 26.08.2025, whereby learned Single Judge, while inviting response from the respondents in Writ C No. 27236 of 2025 (S.M. College and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others), has directed the respondent No. 2, i.e. the present appellant- Guru Jambheshwar University, Moradabad, to enable the respondent No. 4, i.e. Bundelkhand University, Jhansi to reflect the name of the petitioner- institution namely S.M. College Chandausi, Sambhal, in the list of institutions which are participating in the counseling, subject to outcome of the writ petition.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1