Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (0.39 seconds)

Food Corporation Of India And Others vs Debendra Ram on 27 February, 2017

6. From the above pleadings of the parties, so far as codonation of delay application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is concerned, this Court finds that the reasons ascribed to condone the delay do not justify the "sufficient cause", inasmuch it clearly indicates that there was bureaucratic movement of the file. This Court considered the similar question in State of Orissa v. Bishnupriya Routray, 2014 (II) ILR-CUT-847 and, relying upon judgments of the apex Court in Collector (LA) v. Mst.
Orissa High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - B R Sarangi - Full Document

Food Corporation Of India And Others vs Jalabi Saha on 27 February, 2017

6. From the above pleadings of the parties, so far as codonation of delay application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is concerned, this Court finds that the reasons ascribed to condone the delay do not justify the "sufficient cause", inasmuch it clearly indicates that there was bureaucratic movement of the file. This Court considered the similar question in State of Orissa v. Bishnupriya Routray, 2014 (II) ILR-CUT-847 and, relying upon judgments of the apex Court in Collector (LA) v. Mst.
Orissa High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - B R Sarangi - Full Document

Vice Chancellor Utkal University And ... vs Chakradhar Barik on 18 October, 2017

14. Similar question had come up for consideration by this Court in State of Orissa v. Bishnupriya Routray 2014(II) ILR-CUT 847: Vol. 118 (2014) CLT 580. The judgment of this Court was assailed before the apex Court in SLP but the same was dismissed and as such, the apex Court observed that if any delay caused due to the laches on the part of the authority, then any loss to be caused that should be realized from the officer concerned who is responsible for the same.
Orissa High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - B R Sarangi - Full Document

Central Reserve Police Force And Others vs Upendra Panda on 10 November, 2017

In State of Orissa v. Bishnupriya Routray, 2014 (II) ILR-CUT-847, this Court also refused to condone the delay of 706 days in preferring the appeal. Against the said judgment though SLP was filed, the same was dismissed by the apex Court because of non-furnishing the cause to condone the delay. In the case in hand, delay of 199 days has been caused only for bureaucratic movement of the file and as such each day's delay has not been explained as required under law. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to condone the delay.
Orissa High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - B R Sarangi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next