Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.00 seconds)

A.Anbalagan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 19 September, 2022

4. The respondents have filed a detailed counter affidavit. The learned Standing counsel appearing for Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission took me through the averments set out therein. According to the learned counsel, the issue raised in the writ petition is no longer res integra. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/17 4 W.P.(MD)NO.177 OF 2020 He placed reliance on the order dated 22.02.2022 made in W.P.(MD)No.3302 of 2022 (M.Prakash V. The Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai), order dated 20.12.2019 made in W.P.No.35055 of 2019 (M.Arulsubaram V. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Rep. By its Secretary, Chennai) and the order dated 31.03.2022 made in W.P.No.1439 of 2022 ( K.Gomathi V. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Chennai). The learned counsel submitted that the Tamil Nadu Appointment on preferential basis in the Services under the State of Persons Studied in Tamil Medium Act, 2010 was amended vide Tamil Nadu Act No.35 of 2020. The impugned selection process took place before the amendment Act was brought into force. Therefore, looked at from that prospective, the present writ petition will have to be dismissed. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent as well as the learned Standing counsel appearing for Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission would submit that the selected candidates have not been https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/17 5 W.P.(MD)NO.177 OF 2020 impleaded as parties and they pressed for dismissal of the writ petition.
1