Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.81 seconds)

State vs Mahinder Kumar Ors on 16 October, 2025

27. It is alleged that the accused didn't have competence to process the refund. Even this allegation couldn't be established by the prosecution. PW2 DB Gupta stated in his examination in chief that since the refund in favour of the allottee was processed without the permission of the Vice Chairman, DDA, the same was bad. However, he admitted in his cross examination that neither any departmental action was taken against the accused qua the refund, nor the refund or allotment of flat in question was cancelled. This fact State vs. Mahinder Kumar & Ors.
Delhi District Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1