Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.74 seconds)
Documents citing Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs State on 9 December, 2016

Fir No. 542/13 State vs Bheem Page No. 1 Of 22 on 8 January, 2018

In   Gaya   Prasad   Pal   vs.   State   235   (2016)   DLT   264   (DB), Hon'ble High Court of Delhi has held that in cases involving sexual harassment, molestation etc. the court is duty bound to deal with such FIR No. 542/13  State Vs Bheem Page No. 18 of 22 cases with utmost sensitivity. Evidence of the victim of sexual assault is  enough  for   conviction and  it does  not  require  any corroboration unless   there  are   compelling  reasons   for   seeking  corroboration.   The statement of the prosecutrix is more reliable than that of any injured witness   as   she   is   not   an   accomplice.   Thus   a   conviction   can   be sustained   on   the   sole   testimony   of   the   prosecutrix,   if   it   inspires confidence.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Puran vs The State on 13 July, 2022

A Division Bench of this Court as well in Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs. State (2016) 235 DLT 264 relying on Section 5 (p) of the POSCO Act in a case where the step-father was the accused, noted that "thus, the penetrative sexual assault having occurred within the confines of the home where the prosecutrix was living with the appellant, virtually her guardian, clause (p) of Section 5 also renders it a case of aggravated penetrative sexual assault".
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - M Gupta - Full Document

Mr Mohamad Faiyaaz vs State Of Nct Delhi on 27 January, 2022

dated 2.8.2021 of the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, POCSO Court and the impugned order on sentence dated 1.11.2021 therein in relation to FIR No. 244/2017, Police Station Sadar Bazar under Sections 342/354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 10 of the POCSO Act whereby the appellant having been convicted qua the said offences vide judgment dated 2.8.2021 was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- qua the offence punishable under Sections 10 of the POCSO Act and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year qua the offence punishable under Sections 342 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and no separate sentence was passed under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in view of the verdict of this Court in Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh V. State; Crl.A. No. 538/2016.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Malhotra - Full Document
1