Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India vs Bharat Fritz Werner Limited on 17 February, 2022

The Secretary vs Elephant G. Rajendran on 6 November, 2023

(xi) Union of India vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine SC 195 “5. ... The High Court was not deciding a Public Interest Litigation. The High Court did not even decide the writ petition on merits. On the contrary, in the earlier paragraph, it was observed that it had not gone into the merits of the writ petitioner's claim or the respondent's defence. In such circumstances, such general observations should have been avoided by the High Court and the High Court ought to have restricted itself to the controversy between the parties before it. Even otherwise, on the basis of a solitary case, general observations could not have been made by the High Court that the Indian bidders are being discriminated against. We advise the High Courts not to make general observations which are not warranted in the case. The High Courts shall refrain from making sweeping observations which are beyond the contours of the controversy and/or issues before them.”
Madras High Court Cites 96 - Cited by 0 - S Vaidyanathan - Full Document

K.K. Sreerangan vs S.Deivasigamani on 16 September, 2025

10. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that there is no proof adduced by the Writ Petitioner in support of his allegation that the appellants have been drawing water directly from the Bhavani River. He drew the attention of this Court to the judgment of Apex Court in the case of Union of India vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Limited and another, reported in 2022 (13) SCC 362, to state that general sweeping observations, which are beyond the contours of the controversy should not be made. The relevant passage of the said judgment is extracted hereunder:
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - J N Banu - Full Document
1