Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.59 seconds)

Fir No: 188/2019, Ps: Nfc Case ... vs . Modh. Yashir @ Danny on 22 November, 2022

18. On 01.10.2022, accused were examined under section 313 Cr.P.C wherein incriminating material appearing in evidence against accused were put to accused to which accused stated that there must be confusion in hearing names as accused were not present at the spot. They stated that they cannot say whether any such incident took place or not as they were not FIR No: 188/2019, PS: NFC Case Registration No. 40/2020 State Vs. Modh. Yashir @ danny page no. 7....of 11 there. They stated that they have been falsely implicated in present case by police officials. They stated that they never given supplementary statement to police. They stated that it is a false case. They stated that they are innocent and falsely implicate in this case.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Modh. Nadimuddin on 7 February, 2023

11. In the present case, the accused has been charged for the offence punishable u/s. 411 IPC. Since the testimony of FIR No. No. 76/2016 State Vs. Modh. Nadimuddin Page no.4/5 the complainant could not be recorded as he was not traceable through DCP concerned and was consequently dropped from the list of witnesses, the fact regarding theft, for which the present case FIR was lodged in the police station and consequently, the accused having the possession of a stolen property could not be established. All the other witnesses are police officials/formal witnesses and their examination could have been supplementary step to join the link of investigation and the sequence of events. But, in the absence of examination of material witness i.e. the complainant, the other witnesses are of no help to the prosecution.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohd Salman vs State Of U.P. And Another on 17 August, 2023

5. Therefore, the instant application is disposed of with a direction to Juvenile Justice Board, Moradabad, to conclude the Case No. 109 of 2015 (State vs. Modh. Salman), arising out of Case Crime No. 71 of 2015 u/S 147, 148, 186, 336, 353, 436, 427, 341 I.P.C. r/s Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act and 3 of Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984, P.S.- Nagfani, District- Moradabad, pending before Juvenile Justice Board, Moradabad, within a period of 6 months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1