Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)

Harinder Singh vs State Bank Of India on 30 June, 2015

6. It becomes very much clear from this Award that it was the Company, which was claiming Rs.1,50,000/-, for which the complainant had issued the cheque and the complainant agreed to forego that amount after the full and final settlement reached at. The subject-matter of the complaint was also the subject-matter of the claim preferred before the Arbitrator, who heard and finally decided the same. It stands proved that the complainant already exhausted his remedy before the Arbitrator. It was held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Haryana Urban Development Authority and another v. Satish Hans" 2009 (4) RCR (Civil) 175 that where a consumer avails the other remedy available to him, he cannot thereafter move the Fora under the Act. Therefore, the complaint filed by the complainant before the District Forum was not at all maintainable. There is no ground to admit this appeal to be heard on merits and the same is hereby dismissed in limine.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1