Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing Sanjana Patel & Anr. vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secretary, ... on 25 March, 2021

Azad Alias Ismail vs State Of Haryana on 17 February, 2023

2 of 11 ::: Downloaded on - 31-05-2023 16:23:28 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:030479-DB CRM-M-45406-2022 (O&M) -:3 :- He further contended that under Section 7-A of Act, 2000, an accused is entitled to raise a claim of juvenility before any Court, even after the final disposal of the case and to this effect reliance has been placed upon rulings Ashok vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No.643 of 2020 decided on 29.11.2021, Sanjay Patel & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2022 AIR (Supreme Court) 1852 and Vinod Katara vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, Writ Petition (Criminal) No.121 of 2022 decided on 12.09.2022 by Hon'ble Supreme Court. He further contended that such a claim is required to be determined in accordance with the provisions of Act, 2000.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Pandey @ Sanju vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 February, 2023

4. This Court seeks assistance of Dr. NK Shukla, Senior Advocate present in the Court, who submits that after dismissal of the SLP, the only remedy lies is to file an appropriate application before the Supreme Court only unless a specific direction has been given by the said Court to any other Court. He refers that recently in M.A No.1997/2021 in SLP (Cr.) No.5604/2009 (Sanjay Patel and Anr. Vs. State of U.P), the Allahabad High Court has confirmed the conviction 3 and vide SLP dated 13.08.2009, dismissed the same. Thereafter, the Petitioner has moved the miscellaneous application before the Supreme Court vide M.A No.1997/2021 for claiming the juvenility in which, the Sessions Court was directed to submit a report about the age determination.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1