citedby: 26596259

M/S N.N. Global Mercantile Private ... vs M/S Indo Unique Flame Ltd. on 25 April, 2023

Paragraphs 22 and 29 in Garware (supra) which were approved in paragraphs 146 and 147 in Vidya Drolia (supra) are overruled to that extent.

Supreme Court of India Cites 229 - Cited by 104 - K Joseph - Full Document

Relan Infracon Pvt. Ltd vs Jasvinder Kaur on 14 December, 2022

In view of the finding in paras 146 and 147 of the judgment in Vidya Drolia [Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn., (2021) 2 SCC 1 : (2021) 1 SCC (Civ) 549] by a coordinate Bench, which has affirmed the judgment in Garware [Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engg. Ltd., (2019) 9 SCC 209 : (2019) 4 SCC (Civ) 324] , the aforesaid issue is required to be authoritatively settled by a Constitution Bench of this Court.

Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 29 - Cited by 3 - Y Varma - Full Document

Vr Commodities Private Limited vs Norvic Shipping Asia Pte. Ltd., on 5 May, 2022

Therefore, basing on the principle laid down in ―Garware Wall Ropes Limited v. Coastal Marine Constructions and Engineering Limited‖ and ―SMS Tea Estates Private Limited vs. Chandmari Tea Company Private Limited‖ (referred supra), it is difficult to uphold the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant since the same was turned down by the Full Bench indirectly while referring the matter to the Constitution Bench.

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - P K Mishra - Full Document

Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) ... vs Waterline Hotels Pvt. Ltd. on 25 January, 2022

In view of the finding in paras 146 and 147 of the judgment in Vidya Drolia [Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn., (2021) 2 SCC 1 by a coordinate Bench, which has affirmed the judgment in Garware [Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engg. Ltd., (2019) 9 SCC 209], the aforesaid issue is required to be authoritatively settled by a Constitution bench of this Court.

Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 46 - N V Ramana - Full Document

Dodballapur Integrated Textile Park ... vs Mrs Premalatha G Jain on 16 March, 2023

We consider it appropriate to refer the findings in paras 22 and 29 of Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. [Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engg. Ltd., (2019) 9 SCC 209 : (2019) 4 SCC (Civ) 324] , which has been affirmed in paras 146 and 147 of Vidya Drolia [Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn., (2021) 2 SCC 1: (2021) 1 SCC (Civ) 549], to a Constitution Bench of five Judges."

Karnataka High Court Cites 69 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

Millennium City Expressways Private ... vs The State Of Haryana & Anr on 2 March, 2023

In view of the finding in paras 146 and 147 of the judgment in Vidya Drolia [Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn., (2021) 2 SCC 1 : (2021) 1 SCC (Civ) 549] by a coordinate Bench, which has affirmed the judgment in Garware [Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engg. Ltd., (2019) 9 SCC 209 : (2019) 4 SCC (Civ) 324] , the aforesaid issue is required to be authoritatively settled by a Constitution Bench of this Court.

Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document

Spml Infra Ltd vs Ntpc Limited on 8 April, 2021

In addition to Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. case [Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engg. Ltd., (2019) 9 SCC 209 : (2019) 4 SCC (Civ) 324] , this Court in Narbheram Power & Steel (P) Ltd. [Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Narbheram Power & Steel (P) Ltd., (2018) 6 SCC 534 : (2018) 3 SCC (Civ) 484] and Hyundai Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. [United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Hyundai Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd., (2018) 17 SCC 607 : (2019) 2 SCC (Civ) 530] , both decisions of three Judges, has rejected the application for reference in the insurance contracts holding that the claim was beyond and not covered by the arbitration agreement.

Delhi High Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - V Bakhru - Full Document

M/S.Mandava Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs M/S.Khiviraj Automibiles And ... on 29 August, 2019

As held above in SMS Tea Estates (supra) which has been followed in Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. Vs. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. reported in 2019 (6) SCALE 250, the unregistered agreement which contain arbitration clause 16/24 http://www.judis.nic.in O.P.No.698 of 2018 requires compulsory registration can be relied upon to refer the dispute. Accordingly, the contention of the learned counsel in this regard cannot be countenanced.

Madras High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

M/S.Chennai Network Infrastructure ... vs T.Kannan on 15 July, 2022

9(iv) Learned counsel for respondent drew the attention of this Court to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Garware case (Garware Wall Ropes Limited Vs. Coastal Marine Constructions and Engineering Limited reported in (2019) 9 SCC 209). The most relevant and instructive paragraph in Garware is Paragraph 22 and the same reads as follows:

Madras High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document

Mr. Saripalli Prasad Rao vs Mr. Anand Mallipudi on 18 July, 2023

and contends that the arbitration application needs to be dismissed in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court.

Telangana High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - S Nanda - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results