Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.53 seconds)
Documents citing P.M. Muthish Chettiar vs Inspector General Of Registration, ... on 8 August, 2001

Balaji vs The State Rep. By Sub Divisional ... on 14 June, 2022

Further, in the judgment rendered in Devi Vs State, in Crl.R.C.No.78 of 2020, by order dated 25.09.2020, another Hon'ble Judge of this Court had doubted the power of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in passing detention order and while deferring with the view taken in P.Sathish Vs State and another, cited supra had referred the issues to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constituting a larger bench and thereby, it would take some time to decide the issue. He would therefore, pray for suspension of sentence pending revision.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Dinesh Kumar @ Dheena vs The Executive Magistrate Cum Deputy ... on 23 June, 2022

Further, in the judgment rendered in Devi Vs State, in Crl.R.C.No.78 of 2020, by order dated 25.09.2020, another https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/7 Crl.M.P.No.1149 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.118 of 2022 Hon'ble Judge of this Court had doubted the power of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in passing detention order and while differing with the view taken in P.Sathish Vs State and another, cited supra had referred the issues to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constituting a larger bench and thereby, it would take some time to decide the issue. He would therefore, pray for suspension of sentence pending revision.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Dinesh Kumar @ Dheena vs The Executive Magistrate Cum Deputy ... on 23 June, 2022

Further, in the judgment rendered in Devi Vs State, in Crl.R.C.No.78 of 2020, by order dated 25.09.2020, another https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/7 Crl.M.P.No.1149 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.118 of 2022 Hon'ble Judge of this Court had doubted the power of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in passing detention order and while differing with the view taken in P.Sathish Vs State and another, cited supra had referred the issues to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constituting a larger bench and thereby, it would take some time to decide the issue. He would therefore, pray for suspension of sentence pending revision.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Manikandan @ Perukka Manikandan vs The Administrative Executive ... on 18 July, 2022

Further, in the judgment rendered in Devi Vs State, in Crl.R.C.No.78 of 2020, by order dated 25.09.2020, another Hon'ble Judge of this Court had doubted the power of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in passing detention order and while differing with the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 Crl.M.P.No.9591 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.924 of 2022 view taken in P.Sathish Vs State and another, cited supra had referred the issues to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constituting a larger bench and thereby, it would take some time to decide the issue. He would therefore, pray for suspension of sentence pending revision.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Vignesh @ Vicky vs The Sub-Divisional Magistrate And Sub ... on 18 July, 2022

Further, in the judgment rendered in Devi Vs State, in Crl.R.C.No.78 of 2020, by order dated 25.09.2020, another Hon'ble Judge of this Court had doubted the power of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in passing detention order and while differing with the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 Crl.M.P.No.9639 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.926 of 2022 view taken in P.Sathish Vs State and another, cited supra had referred the issues to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constituting a larger bench and thereby, it would take some time to decide the issue. He would therefore, pray for suspension of sentence pending revision.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Arivazhagan vs The Sub-Divisional Magistrate And on 18 July, 2022

Further, in the judgment rendered in Devi Vs State, in Crl.R.C.No.78 of 2020, by order dated 25.09.2020, another Hon'ble Judge of this Court had doubted the power of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in passing detention order and while differing with the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 Crl.M.P.No.9584 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.922 of 2022 view taken in P.Sathish Vs State and another, cited supra had referred the issues to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constituting a larger bench and thereby, it would take some time to decide the issue. He would therefore, pray for suspension of sentence pending revision.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Manikandan @ Perukka Manikandan vs The Administrative Executive ... on 18 July, 2022

Further, in the judgment rendered in Devi Vs State, in Crl.R.C.No.78 of 2020, by order dated 25.09.2020, another Hon'ble Judge of this Court had doubted the power of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in passing https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 Crl.M.P.No.9591 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.924 of 2022 detention order and while differing with the view taken in P.Sathish Vs State and another, cited supra had referred the issues to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constituting a larger bench and thereby, it would take some time to decide the issue. He would therefore, pray for suspension of sentence pending revision.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Aaran @ Aruchamy vs The Taluk Administrative Magistrate ... on 22 July, 2022

Further, in the judgment rendered in Devi Vs State, in Crl.R.C.No.78 of 2020, by order dated 25.09.2020, another Hon'ble Judge of this Court had doubted the power of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in passing detention order and while differing with the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 Crl.M.P.No.10315 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.984 of 2022 view taken in P.Sathish Vs State and another, cited supra had referred the issues to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constituting a larger bench and thereby, it would take some time to decide the issue. He would therefore, pray for suspension of sentence pending revision.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Ramar vs The Taluk Administrative Magistrate ... on 22 July, 2022

Further, in the judgment rendered in Devi Vs State, in Crl.R.C.No.78 of 2020, by order dated 25.09.2020, another Hon'ble Judge of this Court had doubted the power of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in passing detention order and while differing with the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 Crl.M.P.No.10375 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.992 of 2022 view taken in P.Sathish Vs State and another, cited supra had referred the issues to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constituting a larger bench and thereby, it would take some time to decide the issue. He would therefore, pray for suspension of sentence pending revision.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Ramar vs The Taluk Administrative Magistrate ... on 22 July, 2022

Further, in the judgment rendered in Devi Vs State, in Crl.R.C.No.78 of 2020, by order dated 25.09.2020, another Hon'ble Judge of this Court had doubted the power of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in passing https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 Crl.M.P.No.10375 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.992 of 2022 detention order and while differing with the view taken in P.Sathish Vs State and another, cited supra had referred the issues to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constituting a larger bench and thereby, it would take some time to decide the issue. He would therefore, pray for suspension of sentence pending revision.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document
1   2 3 Next