Smt. Sharda Manaktala vs Sh. Subodh Kumar Gupta on 31 August, 2018
CS No.31/2014,
Subodh Kumar Gupta v Sharda Manaktala; that on various pretexts, the
plaintiff had obtained signatures of the defendant on blank papers; that
the rent agreement dated 06.02.2013 has been fabricated by the plaintiff
on the said blank papers; that the rent agreement dated 06.02.2013 is
liable to be impounded under the provisions of Stamp Act, 1899; that
upon receipt of the legal notice dated 24.12.2013, the defendant had
neither sent the reply dated 31.12.2013 nor sent the copy of cheque of
Rs.9200/, filed by the plaintiff; that instead, the defendant had sent the
reply dated 31.12.2013, filed along with the written statement and a
cheque of Rs.7500/; that the said reply and cheque were returned back
to the defendant with the remarks, "undelivered" and "unclaimed" and
that the defendant cannot be directed to vacate the tenanted premises
because as per the oral agreement made by the parties, the defendant is
entitled to stay in the tenanted premises till 31.03.2018.