Arsiya Bano vs State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. on 25 July, 2022
d) Qua the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in respect of Writ-A No. 487 of 2022 for re-evaluation of question nos. 76 and 79 of Booklet Series "C" which was provided to the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents submits that against the said questions, the petitioner has given incorrect/incomplete answer. As per the re-evaluated answer-key published on 18th September, 2020, the correct answer to Question No. 76 is "संचयी अभीलेख/उपख्यानतमक (अनेकद्योतल) अभीलेख/ छात्र प्रोफाइल/छात्र प्रगति अभिलेख/संचित अभिलेख/पोर्टफोलियो, whereas the petitioner has given the answer as " छात्र अभीलेख". Similarly, the correct answer to question no.79 is "विचार-विमर्ष/सहकारी/वाद-विवाद/सहभागी शिक्षण/समुह चर्चा/रुचिपूर्ण सामूहिक शिक्षा, whereas the petitioner has given the answer as " छात्र सहभागिता विधि". Therefore, he has not been awarded marks to the said questions and controversy has been settled in favour of respondents by a Writ Court in the case of Gargi Singh (Supra).