Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.64 seconds)

Rajputana Stainless Ltd vs Vadodara-Ii on 17 March, 2022

and in case of M/s. Shree Jagdamba Castings (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 695 (Tri.-Del.) it has been held that the credit availed on the basis of invoices issued by the registered dealer, cannot be denied on the ground that the transporters have admitted the fact of non-transportation of the goods and the addresses of truck owners were found to be fake.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neosym Industry Ltd.(Formerly Known As ... vs Mumbai-Iii on 28 February, 2023

as also from the Tribunal's decision in case of M/s. Shree Jagdamba Castings (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 695 (Tri.-Del.). It has been held in said judgments that the credit availed on the basis of invoices issued by the registered dealer, cannot be denied on the ground that the transporters have admitted the fact of non- transportation of the goods and the addresses of truck owners were found to be fake.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chawla Highway Carries Ho vs Mumbai-Iii on 28 February, 2023

as also from the Tribunal's decision in case of M/s. Shree Jagdamba Castings (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 695 (Tri.-Del.). It has been held in said judgments that the credit availed on the basis of invoices issued by the registered dealer, cannot be denied on the ground that the transporters have admitted the fact of non- transportation of the goods and the addresses of truck owners were found to be fake.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Damodar Sharma vs Mumbai-Iii on 28 February, 2023

as also from the Tribunal's decision in case of M/s. Shree Jagdamba Castings (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 695 (Tri.-Del.). It has been held in said judgments that the credit availed on the basis of invoices issued by the registered dealer, cannot be denied on the ground that the transporters have admitted the fact of non- transportation of the goods and the addresses of truck owners were found to be fake.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dhuleva Metal vs Mumbai-Iii on 28 February, 2023

as also from the Tribunal's decision in case of M/s. Shree Jagdamba Castings (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 695 (Tri.-Del.). It has been held in said judgments that the credit availed on the basis of invoices issued by the registered dealer, cannot be denied on the ground that the transporters have admitted the fact of non- transportation of the goods and the addresses of truck owners were found to be fake.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Time & Space Haulers vs Mumbai-Iii on 28 February, 2023

as also from the Tribunal's decision in case of M/s. Shree Jagdamba Castings (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 695 (Tri.-Del.). It has been held in said judgments that the credit availed on the basis of invoices issued by the registered dealer, cannot be denied on the ground that the transporters have admitted the fact of non- transportation of the goods and the addresses of truck owners were found to be fake.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bon Lon Steel Pvt. Ltd. vs Mumbai-Iii on 28 February, 2023

as also from the Tribunal's decision in case of M/s. Shree Jagdamba Castings (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 695 (Tri.-Del.). It has been held in said judgments that the credit availed on the basis of invoices issued by the registered dealer, cannot be denied on the ground that the transporters have admitted the fact of non- transportation of the goods and the addresses of truck owners were found to be fake.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nitin N. Mehta vs Mumbai-Iii on 28 February, 2023

as also from the Tribunal's decision in case of M/s. Shree Jagdamba Castings (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 695 (Tri.-Del.). It has been held in said judgments that the credit availed on the basis of invoices issued by the registered dealer, cannot be denied on the ground that the transporters have admitted the fact of non- transportation of the goods and the addresses of truck owners were found to be fake.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neosym Industry Limited. vs Mumbai-Iii on 28 February, 2023

as also from the Tribunal's decision in case of M/s. Shree Jagdamba Castings (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 695 (Tri.-Del.). It has been held in said judgments that the credit availed on the basis of invoices issued by the registered dealer, cannot be denied on the ground that the transporters have admitted the fact of non- transportation of the goods and the addresses of truck owners were found to be fake.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ugamraj Jain vs Mumbai-Iii on 28 February, 2023

as also from the Tribunal's decision in case of M/s. Shree Jagdamba Castings (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 695 (Tri.-Del.). It has been held in said judgments that the credit availed on the basis of invoices issued by the registered dealer, cannot be denied on the ground that the transporters have admitted the fact of non- transportation of the goods and the addresses of truck owners were found to be fake.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next