Karra Swaminarayana vs Registrar (Management) And Anr. on 11 September, 1997
To the same effect is the decision of another Division Bench of this Court in Executive Committee, S.B.H. v. D. Dhaneszvara Rao (supra).
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (1.26 seconds)S. Rajeswaran vs The Tamil Nadu Administrative ... on 1 April, 2004
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, the delinquent officer, has cited several authorities, namely (i) (Khatri (IV) vs. State of Bihar), (ii) 1997 (I) L.L.J. 206 (C.M.Deshmukh & etc., vs. The Board of Trustees, Bombay Port), (iii) 1996 (II) L.L.J. 272 (Executive Committee, SBH Hyderabad & Anr. vs. D.Dhaneswara Rao); (iv) VIII-1991 (2) All India Services Law Journal 468 (P.Mani Paul & Ors. vs. U.O.I. & Ors.); (v) AIR 1994 SC 1205 (Vishnu Kondaji Jadhav vs. State of Maharashtra); (vi) 1997 (Vol.XLI) M.L.J. (Crl.)
R. Muthukrishnan vs Indian Overseas Bank on 2 August, 2007
He would also submit that in these sort of cases where the customers have the contact with the Bank, the customers need not be involved in enquiry, and he would rely upon Executive Committee, SBH, Hyderabad vs. D. Dhaneswara Rao (1996(2) LLJ 272). He would also submit that when the Disciplinary Authority agrees with the Enquiry Officer, it is not necessary for the Disciplinary Authority to go into and discuss each and every minute points while passing the final orders.
1