Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)

Smt. Raj Kumari W/O Sh. Harbansh Singh vs M/S Yuva Shakti Model School on 12 May, 2010

12. This document though not proved by examining its author presuming the facts therein as true, it is clear when the workman had refused to join the duties by submitting the joining report, it was expected by the management to have atleast intimated the Labour Inspector who had visited which fact is admitted by the management. The management has not intimated the Labour Inspector about the non willingness of the workman to join the duties. In such a situation and more particularly when the principal concerned has not been examined in this case, the contention of the management that she had voluntarily abandoned the duties can not be accepted. The management in the written arguments also has stated that the services of the workman was not terminated. The workman in this case is an office assistant with the management. The AR for the management relied on the ruling of our Hon'ble High Court in Monica Jawa Vs. Director of Education, 110 (2004) Delhi Law Times 139. This was a case of a teacher in a recognized school under the Delhi School Education Act. It was held by our Hon'ble High Court that the charge sheets issued against the teacher
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1