citedby: 27601094

Arulmigu Alathikaadu Ayyanar Temple vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 September, 2023

In W.P.No.23096 of 2013 vide judgment dated 12.02.2020 in the case of H.H. Sankarachary Seamigal Kanchi Kamakodi Peetam Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu, wherein it held as under:

Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

Krishnasamy Nadar ( Died) vs The Commissioner on 21 September, 2023

16. The Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner relied on the judgment dated 12.02.2020 rendered in W.P.No.23096 of 2013 in the case of H.H. Sankarachary Seamigal Kanchi Kamakodi Peetam Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu, wherein it held as under:

Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

Thirumalai Muthu vs The Commissioner

a. W.P.(MD)No.20915 of 2013 dated 30.09.2015 in Arulmigu Angala Eswari Amman Temple Vs. Commissioner b. N.Sivasubramanian Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu reported in 2006 (2) CTC 49 c. Arulmigu Athanoorammal Podarayasamy Vs. Assistant Commissioner HR & CE (Admn) Department reported in CDJ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 32/40 W.P.(MD).No.20349 of 2023 2012 MHC 3783 d. R.R. Thirupathy and others Vs. Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment reported in (2015) 3 LW 106 e. H.H.Sankarachari Seamigal Kanchi Kamakodi Peetam Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu in W.P.No.23096 of 2013 dated 12.02.2020 f. Sri Ram Samaj Vs. Commissioner HR & CE reported in 2022 (4) MLJ 449 e. Solaimuthuraja Vs. Commissioner HR & CE reported in 2010 (2) CTC 289 f. R.Shanmugasundram Vs. Commissioner of HR & CE (1991 2 MLJ 582) g. W.P.(MD)No.22398 of 2023 and this Court vide order dated 13.09.2023

Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

Thirumalai Muthu vs The Commissioner on 3 November, 2023

a. W.P.(MD)No.20915 of 2013 dated 30.09.2015 in Arulmigu Angala Eswari Amman Temple Vs. Commissioner b. N.Sivasubramanian Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu reported in 2006 (2) CTC 49 c. Arulmigu Athanoorammal Podarayasamy Vs. Assistant Commissioner HR & CE (Admn) Department reported in CDJ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 32/40 W.P.(MD).No.20349 of 2023 2012 MHC 3783 d. R.R. Thirupathy and others Vs. Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment reported in (2015) 3 LW 106 e. H.H.Sankarachari Seamigal Kanchi Kamakodi Peetam Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu in W.P.No.23096 of 2013 dated 12.02.2020 f. Sri Ram Samaj Vs. Commissioner HR & CE reported in 2022 (4) MLJ 449 e. Solaimuthuraja Vs. Commissioner HR & CE reported in 2010 (2) CTC 289 f. R.Shanmugasundram Vs. Commissioner of HR & CE (1991 2 MLJ 582) g. W.P.(MD)No.22398 of 2023 and this Court vide order dated 13.09.2023

Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

Sri La Sri Harihara Sri Gnanasambanda vs The Commissioner on 1 December, 2023

a. W.P.(MD)No.20915 of 2013 dated 30.09.2015 in Arulmigu Angala Eswari Amman Temple Vs. Commissioner b. N.Sivasubramanian Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu reported in 2006 (2) CTC 49 c. Arulmigu Athanoorammal Podarayasamy Vs. Assistant Commissioner HR & CE (Admn) Department reported in CDJ 2012 MHC 3783 d. R.R. Thirupathy and others Vs. Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment reported in (2015) 3 LW 106 e. H.H.Sankarachari Seamigal Kanchi Kamakodi Peetam Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu in W.P.No.23096 of 2013 dated 12.02.2020 f. Sri Ram Samaj Vs. Commissioner HR & CE reported in 2022 (4) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 39/45 W.P.(MD).Nos.20194 and 20384 of 2023 MLJ 449 e. Solaimuthuraja Vs. Commissioner HR & CE reported in 2010 (2) CTC 289 f. R.Shanmugasundram Vs. Commissioner of HR & CE (1991 2 MLJ 582) g. W.P.(MD)No.22398 of 2023 and this Court vide order dated 13.09.2023 h. W.P.(MD) No.13749 of 2014 vide order dated 21.09.2023 i.W.P.(MD) No.15234 of 2023 vide order dated 11.09.2023 j. W.P.(MD) No.20349 of 2023 vide order dated 03.11.2023

Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

Sri La Sri Harihara Sri Gnanasambanda vs The Commissioner on 1 December, 2023

a. W.P.(MD)No.20915 of 2013 dated 30.09.2015 in Arulmigu Angala Eswari Amman Temple Vs. Commissioner b. N.Sivasubramanian Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu reported in 2006 (2) CTC 49 c. Arulmigu Athanoorammal Podarayasamy Vs. Assistant https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 47/54 W.P.(MD).Nos.20194 and 20384 of 2023 Commissioner HR & CE (Admn) Department reported in CDJ 2012 MHC 3783 d. R.R. Thirupathy and others Vs. Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment reported in (2015) 3 LW 106 e. H.H.Sankarachari Seamigal Kanchi Kamakodi Peetam Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu in W.P.No.23096 of 2013 dated 12.02.2020 f. Sri Ram Samaj Vs. Commissioner HR & CE reported in 2022 (4) MLJ 449 e. Solaimuthuraja Vs. Commissioner HR & CE reported in 2010 (2) CTC 289 f. R.Shanmugasundram Vs. Commissioner of HR & CE (1991 2 MLJ 582) g. W.P.(MD)No.22398 of 2023 and this Court vide order dated 13.09.2023 h. W.P.(MD) No.13749 of 2014 vide order dated 21.09.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 48/54 W.P.(MD).Nos.20194 and 20384 of 2023 i.W.P.(MD) No.15234 of 2023 vide order dated 11.09.2023 j. W.P.(MD) No.20349 of 2023 vide order dated 03.11.2023

Madras High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

S.Ramasamy vs The Joint Commissioner on 11 September, 2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 7/15 W.P.(MD).No.15234 of 2023 e. H.H.Sankarachari Seamigal Kanchi Kamakodi Peetam Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu in W.P.No.23096 of 2013 dated 12.02.2020.

Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

V.Ganesan vs The Commissioner on 3 June, 2025

5. He also drew the attention of this Court to the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in H.H. Sankaracharya Swamigal V. The Government of Tamil Nadu in W.A. No.216 of 2021 wherein it has held that specific endowments by itself are a religious institution. The relevant portion of the order is extracted hereunder:

Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results