Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.35 seconds)

Azad Singh S/O Late Sh. H.S. Ram vs Krishna Devi W/O Late Sh. Jagdish ... on 28 February, 2023

It is also argued that no one can transfer a better title then he himself has and the executor of the Will not being the owner of the entire house, could not have transferred it by means of Will except to the extent of his own share (Ajay Kumar Jaiswal & Ors. Vs. Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal & Ors., (Allahabad High Court, decided on 25.07.2018). The case laws relied upon by the appellants are based on different factual matrix and the lis in the present appeal is completely different. The appellants questioning the ownership of the executor of the Will Ex.PW1/1 is a far fetched argument as the executor of the Will i.e. late sh. Sisram is also the father of the appellant no.1 and admittedly the appellant no.1 and his family have been residing in the suit property since long (even prior to 1987) along with his siblings (husband of the respondent no.1) and his late father Sh. Sisram.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ajay vs Ajay Kumar Vishwas, Consolidation ... on 5 May, 2023

3. It is contended that applicant had filed aforesaid writ, which was disposed of vide order dated 30.05.2022 directing the opposite party to decide Consolidation Case No.865 (Ajay vs. Sanjay and others) under Section 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act within a period of six months from the date of service of order. Copy of the said order was served to the opposite party on 20.6.2022, but the said direction has not been complied with by the opposite party till date.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R R Agarwal - Full Document

Ajay Jaiswal And 3 Others vs Vineet Jaiswal @ Raju Jaiswal And 2 ... on 8 April, 2026

3. The case of the writ petitioner is that an Original Suit No. 26 of 2026 came to be instituted before the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhadohi (Ajay Jaiswal and others v. Vineet Jaiswal @ Raju Jaiswal and others) seeking declaratory reliefs and permanent temporary injunction. In the said suit, on being entertained on 02.02.2026, notices were issued fixing 05.03.2026 on temporary injunction/ paper 6-Ga, while observing that exparte injunction cannot be granted. Thereafter an urgency application came to be preferred which has been rejected on 19.02.2026 by Incharge, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhadohi in Original Suit No. 26 of 2026.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1