Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 80 (0.45 seconds)

Senthurpandian vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 18 January, 2010

21.Further, in the judgment reported in 2005(5) CTC 380, the facts are different. Initially, a charge memo was issued earlier and suppressing that, 2nd charge memo was issued after a lapse of 12 years and in that context, it was held that the delay of 12 years is vital and the charge memo issued after a lapse of 12 years cannot be sustained. The judgment reported in 2006(1)CTC 476, in the case of Parameswaran vs. State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Rural Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9 & others, the first charge memo was issued in the year 1985 and the second charge memo was issued in the year 1987 and the 3rd memo was issued in 1993 on the same incident and therefore, it was held that charge memo is liable to be quashed, following the judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in the matter of Mahadevan, P.V. v. M.D., Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 2005 (4) CTC 403.
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next