Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 300 (0.76 seconds)
Documents citing Bhagwan Dass And Others vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 31 July, 1987

Bishandeo Choudhary And Ors. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. [Alongwith ... on 11 November, 1994

23. The claim of the petitioners is that their case is similar to that of Bhagwan Dass v. State of Haryana (supra). That was also a case with respect to similar scheme which was temporary in nature. Similar prayer was made in that case also for a direction to the State for regularisation. The Supreme Court after examining all the relevant materials, held that the scheme in question was purely temporary. The moment illiterate adults of villages become literate pursuant to education imparted, the need for an adult education would diminish progressively and ultimately cease. Therefore, it was held that no claim can be made for absorption in a regular employment, merely on the basis of length of service.
Patna High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 3 - B N Agrawal - Full Document

V Purushothama vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 April, 2026

In Bhagwan Dass case [Bhagwan Dass v. State of Haryana, (1987) 4 SCC 634 : 1988 SCC (L&S) 24] this Court recorded that in a claim for equal wages, the duration for which an employee would remain (or had remained) engaged, would not make any difference. So also, the manner of selection and appointment would make no difference. And therefore, whether the selection was made on the basis of open competition or was limited to a cluster of villages, was considered inconsequential, insofar as the applicability of the principle is concerned. And likewise, whether the appointment was for a fixed limited duration (six months, or one year), or for an unlimited duration, was also considered inconsequential, insofar as the applicability of the principle of "equal pay for equal work" is concerned. It was held that the claim for equal wages would be sustainable, where an employee is required to discharge similar duties and responsibilities as regular employees, and the employee concerned possesses the qualifications prescribed for the post. In the above case, this Court rejected the contention advanced on behalf of the Government, that the plea of equal wages by the employees in question, was not sustainable because
Karnataka High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - S R Kumar - Full Document

Prahlad Singh And Others vs Union Of India And Others on 7 May, 2010

ers141082004Shri Bhagwan v. State of Haryana and oth- ers170562004Narayan Singh and others v. Union of India and oth- ers175072004M/s A.D. Plastics v. State of Haryana and oth- ers175922004Surender Kumar v. State of Haryana and others.178482004Nawal Kishore and others v. State of Haryana and oth- ers179582004Kuldeep Singh and another v. State of Haryana and others.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of West Bengal & Ors vs Anirban Ghosh & Ors on 3 September, 2020

The learned Senior Counsel submits that the selection of candidates was done by following the elaborate Guideline framed by the State for this special recruitment drive undertaken with a special object as would appear from Government order no.219-SE(HS)-16A-5/01 dated June 6, 2002. It is submitted that the authority felt great difficulty in overcoming the G.O. No. 1176-SE(S) dated 28th July, 2010 which required such teachers to take the same number of classes as the permanent teachers do. In an attempt to wriggle out of this difficulty the said authority has withdrawn the said G.O., knowing fully well that such withdrawal is only paper work. The so-called contractual part-time teachers will have to continue taking the same number of classes as the regular teachers as they have been doing since at least September 2008, that is, after issuance of the Government Order No. 1757(20) GA dated 24.08.2008 when additional appointment of teachers was stopped in respect of the subjects being taught by teachers like the petitioner. The petitioner is entitled in law to get the same treatment regarding pay and all other service benefits as are being enjoyed by the permanent teachers recognised as such by applying the ratio laid down in Bhagwan Dass vs. State of Haryana and Ors., 1987 (4) SCC 634; Jaipal and Ors. vs. State of Haryana, 1988 (3) SCC 354; and State of Punjab and Ors. vs. Jagjit Singh, 2017 (1) SCC 148, no matter whether the mode of appointment is different.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S Sen - Full Document

State Of West Bengal & Ors vs Anirban Ghosh & Ors on 3 September, 2020

The learned Senior Counsel submits that the selection of candidates was done by following the elaborate Guideline framed by the State for this special recruitment drive undertaken with a special object as would appear from Government order no.219-SE(HS)-16A-5/01 dated June 6, 2002. It is submitted that the authority felt great difficulty in overcoming the G.O. No. 1176-SE(S) dated 28th July, 2010 which required such teachers to take the same number of classes as the permanent teachers do. In an attempt to wriggle out of this difficulty the said authority has withdrawn the said G.O., knowing fully well that such withdrawal is only paper work. The so-called contractual part-time teachers will have to continue taking the same number of classes as the regular teachers as they have been doing since at least September 2008, that is, after issuance of the Government Order No. 1757(20) GA dated 24.08.2008 when additional appointment of teachers was stopped in respect of the subjects being taught by teachers like the petitioner. The petitioner is entitled in law to get the same treatment regarding pay and all other service benefits as are being enjoyed by the permanent teachers recognised as such by applying the ratio laid down in Bhagwan Dass vs. State of Haryana and Ors., 1987 (4) SCC 634; Jaipal and Ors. vs. State of Haryana, 1988 (3) SCC 354; and State of Punjab and Ors. vs. Jagjit Singh, 2017 (1) SCC 148, no matter whether the mode of appointment is different.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 33 - Cited by 1 - S Sen - Full Document

Steel Authority Of India And Ors. vs Visl Employees Association, Rep. By Its ... on 3 June, 2004

"8. The respondents' contention that the mode of recruitment of petitioners is different from the mode of recruitment of squad teachers inasmuch as the petitioners are appointed locally while squad teachers were selected by the subordinate Service Selection Board after competing with candidates from any part of the -country. Emphasis was laid during argument that if a regular selection was held many of the petitioners may not have been appointed, they got the employment because outsiders did not compete. In our opinion, this submission has no merit. Admittedly the petitioners were appointed on the recommendation of a Selection Committee appointed by the Adult Education Department. It is true that the petitioners belong to the locality where they have been posted, but they were appointed only after selection true that they have not been appointed after selection made by the Subordinate Service Selection Board but that is hardly relevant for the purposes of application of doctrine of 'equal pay for equal work'. The difference in mode of selection will not affect the application of the doctrine of 'equal pay for equal work' if both the classes of persons perform similar functions and duties under the same employer. Similar plea raised by the State of Haryana in opposing Dass (supra) was rejected, where it was observed that if the State deliberately chose to limit the selection of candidates from a cluster of a few villages it will not absolve the State for treating such candidates in a discriminatory manner to the disadvantage of the selectees once they are appointed provided the work done by the candidates so selected is similar in nature. The recruitment from the cluster of villages for the purposes of implementing the Adult Education Scheme because the instructors appointed from that area would know the people of that area more intimately and would be in a better position to persuade them to take advantage of the Adult Education Scheme in order to make it a success."
Karnataka High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - K Ramanna - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next