In recent judgment Balammal & ors vs. Muthiar Begum and Anr
2013 (5) CPC 154 Hon'ble High Court of Madras elaborately discussed the aforesaid
rule and concluded that merely because judgment debtor has filed a fresh suit for
Execution no. 43/14
Mrs. Renu Sharma & Anr vs. Meena Choudhary Page no. 13 of 16
possession of same premises which has been decreed in favour of decree holder,
execution could not be stayed by invoking order 21 rule 29 of CPC.
09. It is pertinent to mention the decision of the High Court of
Madras in Balammal and others vs. Muthiar Begum and another1,
wherein at paragraph No.21 it is held as follows:
1 9 . The aspect of the word 'where the Suit is pending' is also of
particular importance since the same connotes that a Suit filed against
holder of a decree of such Court should be pending as on the date when
decree is sought to be executed which has also been considered by High
Court of Madras in the case of Balamnal (supra) in the following
manner:--